Permanently Deleted

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
9 points
*

I think that’s complete bullshit. A different population means earlier rounds of apportionment will go different, not just that one round. Which means you can’t calculate the population difference for losing a seat within a single round of apportionment.

By my guessing and checking, MN loses a seat at 864 less population, not 26. As others have pointed out, it would lose that seat to NY, so no electoral difference in that map.

permalink
report
reply

electoralism

!electoralism@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn’t just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember…we’re all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

Community stats

  • 39

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 33K

    Comments