You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

I’ve always been curious to ask an Indian left-winger: do you personally think that the subcontinent’s communal situation would be better today if the partition had never happened? I’ve seen an argument that, while it would seemingly be better for stability if two groups who didn’t get along were separated into different states, that in reality the effect was just to equip each side of the feud with rocket artillery and nuclear weapons. If there had never been wars with Pakistan and Hindus had a smaller majority, would the situation for Indian Muslims be better now?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’ve thought about this a lot. A lot of India’s policies and social life is centered around countering Pakistan. Our extravagant military budget, for one. Pakistan is used for nationalism too. If anyone is critical of India or the government, the common retort is “go to Pakistan”. When India performs poorly on global metrics of poverty, education etc., the fall back is to compare to Pakistan (which usually does worse). When people talk about lack of freedom (of speech, of press etc), again Pakistan. I haven’t even talked about how people view Indian Muslims as secret agents of Pakistan, or working on Pakistan’s behalf. It feeds into the racism, xenophobia etc. And Bangladesh is used to denounce “illegal immigration”.

The Partition was a terrible thing to happen to South Asia. Millions died, tens of millions became refugees overnight, losing their houses, their belongings, their jobs, having to move hundreds of kilometers on foot just so they could live. Most people, whether leaders of various groups, or the population at large, didn’t want the partition at all. There were very legitimate concerns about the fate of Muslims in an Independent India, which was given as a reason for the Partition, but that just made things worse. Muslims would have been a third of the population, and the Hindu fascists could do nothing about that. At that time, in the 40s, 50s, 60s, Hindu fascists were nowhere close to power. And they would never have dared to destroy the Babri Masjid, or commit the various atrocities in Kashmir, or anything of that sort.

Anyways, sorry I rambled on. Yeah, the Partition was bad, for India, for Pakistan, for everyone. The only people who’ve benefited from it are Hindu fascists, the military, and the West.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Main

!main@hexbear.net

Create post

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN “MAIN” OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion’s Main!

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!


State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

An Amainzing Organizing Story

Main Source for Feminism for Babies

Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide


Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

Community stats

  • 131

    Monthly active users

  • 38K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments