Under pressure to approve it, ignore potential problems, so line goes up.
RT
The EMA has claimed that the contents of the messages, which were obtained by hackers and published on the dark web, were tampered with in order to undermine confidence in the drugs, without providing further details. However, the agency acknowledged to the French newspaper that the correspondences reflect “issues and discussions” that took place in the lead-up to the decision to grant approval to the vaccines. The agency said it can’t specify which documents are genuine.
That’s not the response of agency who knows what was published is false. The oringal story was also published by Le Monde, not RT.
One of my best friends parents runs a lab at a world renowned cancer hospital and she isn’t taking the Pfizer vaccine until she is forced to because she specifically doesn’t trust Pfizer from her own experience in knowing how they operate (falsifying results, intimidation, bribery, etc.)
Part of what allows sources like CNN to be viewed as legit by the establishment is not publishing stories that would rock the boat.
Dissident information will always come from slightly sketch sources, read with a skeptical lens and be aware of outlets’ biases (which you should probably do anyway)
