You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

Following the money is a useful investigative method, but it’s not conclusive in cases like this.

Say a journalist gets their work printed in a few publications and does some podcasting that brings in additional money. If one of those publications gets some nefarious federal dollars, how much impact does that have on the journalist’s work?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It has the impact of subsidizing someone who is shilling for the government. Don’t resort to quantum theory because they just happen to play on your sympathies

permalink
report
parent
reply

“Quantum theory” is calling someone a fed because one of the outlets they get published in at some point got money from some federal organization. That’s ridiculous, and copjacketing is a real problem. You have to have a stronger connection before you levy that sort of accusation at someone.

Say the National Endowment for Democracy is a minority shareholder in the Washington Post. Is every WaPo journalist now a fed?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Lol yes a thousand times about the wapo journalists, bezos has contracts with the CIA anyways like are you really sure you wanna go with that example? Anyways, lots of idiots work for the feds, and guess what that makes them? You know I have to do it to em: Also feds.

permalink
report
parent
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 125

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments