Link

the good old Socdem:gold-demsoc: :unity: :scared-fash: Fascist unity

Jacobin Bad

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
56 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

That language would be over the top in a straight to video sci-fi thriller never mind a supposedly lefty magazine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

> We need to actively decouple the Xinjiang issue from the pursuit of Western interests in Asia, and provide it with a different framing, one that speaks in universal terms of a rejection of racism and discrimination.

This is the key, I think, to understanding Jacobin’s perspective.

They do talk about US interests in the region and the hypocrisy of the West.

Writing to the US ambassador in Beijing, he [Rubio] asked him to look into the issue because the “crackdown in the XUAR touches on a range of interests critical to US efforts to secure a free and open Indo-Pacific region.” Rubio is now spearheading an effort to ramp-up pressure on China across the board, a push that follows on the heels of Washington’s most hawkish foreign-policy statements on China since it officially recognized the People’s Republic in 1979.

There’s no point talking about holding China to international norms when those norms don’t exist. Reading Jim Wolfreys’s recent book on France, it’s not hard to see similarities with the measures being implemented in Xinjiang: bans on forms of veiling, citizens encouraged to look out for signs of radicalization as innocuous as someone changing their eating habits. Many of these PRC citizens have mixed feelings about an issue like Xinjiang: they recognize that CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping might be heavy-handed but think he’s right about Western meddling in China’s affairs.

But, in the end, they want people to not view what is happening from a geopolitical/economic lens and think more in terms of the actual in-the-moment human cost. When viewed from that perspective, yeah, what is happening to Uighurs is bad and they don’t deserve it. But, at the same time, Jacobin doesn’t really provide any solution. They don’t talk about how to influence US policy so that we can actually decouple the Xinjiang issue from the pursuit of Western interests in Asia. They just say that we should. I don’t know if this is because they are idealistic or naive or what.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

https://thediplomat.com/2014/10/chinese-salafism-and-the-saudi-connection/

https://www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/china-muslims-work-change-perceptions-after-knife-attacks

even back in 2014 there was an acknowledgment in VOA & Diplomat of Saudi & Western imperalist-funded Muslim extremism destroying lives & causing terror to unfold in PRC. But only since then has the narrative changed & extremism is now downplayed in the west.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Main

!main@hexbear.net

Create post

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN “MAIN” OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion’s Main!

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!


State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

An Amainzing Organizing Story

Main Source for Feminism for Babies

Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide


Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

Community stats

  • 131

    Monthly active users

  • 38K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments