You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

Bigger tree better tree?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Genuinely a case where size matters, at least in terms of carbon sequestration.

More specifically in this case, primary forests (untouched by human activity) are more diverse than secondary forests. This matters not only in the context that flora and fauna diversity is something to value for its own sake, but also because diverse forests are more productive (accumulate biomass more rapidly) and more resilient/resistant to external shocks such as extreme weather events, invasive species introduction, etc. This matters because as climate crisis events escalate in frequency and intensity many of the ‘new forests’ being planted right now are going to be completely fucking bodied, whereas older forests have a much better chance of riding it out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I have always been interested in forest reclamation, its fascinating how a piece of land reforests in stages. The area where I live is heavily wooded, but few if any of the trees are over 90 years old because before the Great Depression it was all farmland.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Science

!science@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to Hexbear’s science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

Community stats

  • 2

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 37K

    Comments