I’m being genuine here, some thinks that chacha is an environment for genuine leftist organization while others thinks that this site is just a board to post shit. Forming a consensus around what the purpose of the site is, and developing the site towards that goal will be better for the growth of our community better than any name or any other vanity changes.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

In a functioning community downvotes serve a very useful purpose

true, but i guess that’s my throughline: is chapo.chat/hexbear.net a functioning community? i’m not willing to write it off , and i’m interested to see it evolve, but i don’t know what the “glue” is, so all this rule tweeking and admin drama is a bit inside baseball for me .

IMHO , Downvotes are a very low effort, low cost, broad collapsing of a variation of negative responses one could have, and when i see a chapo.chat/hexbear.net post i’ve disliked, i tend to ignore it unless i can actually be bothered to effort post. so , does this make me a better community member ? i surely wouldn’t be alone in this idea, and i would imagine this interface reflects the structual valuing of the commited poster over the casual , and this might have some influence over why the recent introspection from mods over the tone and direction - because the interface changed the engagment.

Im actually kinda of interested to see if they implement word filtering, and how far they would go with it . sure you can key word search for things, but what about hiding things with words in it as some people have asked for… Would that negate the need for down votes? eg if you filtered out words used often in struggle sessions you don’t appreciate (like the polarising natalism/antinatalism struggle session that tends to happen here) would your experience be more enjoyable and would you be more willing to generate content ? or is it equivalent to sticking your head in the sand? Does anyone on these boards owe each other the right to be heard? or what if the filter was controlled by mods so that certain words couldn’t be avoided - We 👏 need 👏 to 👏 talk 👏 about 👏 Hamiliton .

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Word filtering!! A world filter controlled by the mods?! That type of power in the hands of the mods tends to only end badly from what I’ve seen, it’s not usually even the fault of the mods themselves… just giving someone that power usually makes them think about how it should be implemented.

I get the appeal of a word filter in theory but i worry it just takes one lib to infiltrate the mod team for that to turn into shadow banning and a very disjointed experience overall. Especially since I worry that perhaps this place isn’t functioning as smoothly as I thought, or at least compared with last time I was hanging around here much more often (October/November last year).

Appreciate the input though, if a word filter is ever introduced I nominate “Archibald Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor” for first entry. Cheers

-Soulja

permalink
report
parent
reply

Main

!main@hexbear.net

Create post

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN “MAIN” OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion’s Main!

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!


State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

An Amainzing Organizing Story

Main Source for Feminism for Babies

Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide


Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

Community stats

  • 131

    Monthly active users

  • 38K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments