I fuck with good longform content but I need to know if he’s a massive chud going in.

Started this article on libertarians and it seems pretty good ngl

6 points
*

He’s a technocratic lib with some nice posts you’ll occasionally want to throw against the wall in frustration. He’s desperately confused (he admits DM utterly eludes him) and is brainwormed by the offshoots of Yudkowskianism but his heart’s in the right place amd he has some long form pieces that are really very good.

He’s got a lot of chuds of the NRx type following him though because he takes the view people are arguing in good faith. This leads to some utterly awful takes on the Bell Curve etc.

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

F

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

F

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Here is a good essay that talks about his horrible beliefs and does a close reading of two of his essays to reveal how Siskind hides bad arguments behind his writing style.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

R/sneerclub can fill you in as well if needed

permalink
report
reply
5 points

halfbaked nazism

permalink
report
reply

F

permalink
report
parent
reply

philosophy

!philosophy@hexbear.net

Create post

Other philosophy communities have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it. [ x ]

“I thunk it so I dunk it.” - Descartes


Short Attention Span Reading Group: summary, list of previous discussions, schedule

Community stats

  • 14

    Monthly active users

  • 595

    Posts

  • 9.2K

    Comments