Discuss

6 points

Seems to me that its keeping the atomised conception of the individual completely intact.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I’d say exacerbating it even. It heightens your sense of individuality while amassing everyone else into a faceless amalgamation which only further separates you from your fellow man

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

But our selves are separated from each other. We’re encouraged not to have complex totalities, but instead to code switch between hundreds of simple consumer demographics. Even various flavors of Marxist and anarchist thought are recuperated this way. That feeling you get when two separate friend groups gathered for a party and you didn’t realize that you acted different around each of them? That feeling is now ubiquitous and used to manipulate us into consumption patterns

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yea Deleuze calls this identity fragmentation schizophrenia and argues that it’s the driving force behind post-modernism. The CEO of Buzzfeed actually famously wrote an academic article about this and then went on to weaponize it in the form of Buzzfeed’s “what my little pony horsie are you??” quizzes. Fisher, author of capitalist realism, argues that this is an ideological weapon of liberalism that locks you into supporting capitalism because the fracturing of the self fractures your ability to create biographical narratives and therefore destroys our ability to think historically and think outside of capitalism.

I really don’t think this tendency of capitalism is a constructive one. You can’t form a class consciousness if you don’t have a cohesive consciousness to begin with

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I remember reading that the owner of Buzzfeed is an accelerationist and wanted flood the internet with enough garbage that society wouldn’t have a stable culture until it collapsed.

Found it: https://www.vox.com/2014/5/20/5730762/buzzfeeds-founder-used-to-write-marxist-theory-and-it-explains

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Yes and I’ve read a bit of his paper, which is pretty interesting as much as I can follow it. Direct link for anyone who doesn’t want to dig through the article. I think it dovetails nicely with Society of the Spectacle

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

yeah i read theory:very-smart:

permalink
report
parent
reply

chat

!chat@hexbear.net

Create post

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

Community stats

  • 149

    Monthly active users

  • 3.6K

    Posts

  • 62K

    Comments