“We are going to allow women to work and study. We have got frameworks, of course. Women are going to be very active in the society but within the framework of Islam,” Zabihullah Mujahid, the group’s spokesman, said at a press conference in Kabul on Tuesday.

Mujahid, who had been a shadowy figure for years, said that “there will be no discrimination against women” adding that “they are going to work shoulder to shoulder with us.”

Pressed on how the new Taliban government will differ from the previous one, Mujahid said that the group has evolved and will not take the same actions they did in the past.

“There will be a difference when it comes to the actions we are going to take” compared with 20 years ago, he said.

“We are committed to the media within our cultural frameworks. Private media can continue to be free and independent. They can continue their activities,” he said.

He also said the group has no plans to enter the homes of people or carry out retaliatory attacks on anyone who served in the previous governments, worked with foreigners or were part of the Afghan National Security Forces.

There have been unconfirmed reports of Taliban fighters entering the homes of Kabul residents, but Mujahid said those were impostors who should be turned over to the Taliban and face appropriate punishment

69 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
49 points

Not just the West. If they want to operate a successful economy they will need to be a place where other countries and industries feel somewhat comfortable doing business in.

They’re probably well aware that retributive killings and rolling women’s rights back to 1996 is not a good first step towards rebuilding the country under a unified government.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

There have been (slow) advances in women’s rights in Iran and Saudi Arabia since the 90s, so it’s not out of the realm of possibilities to see some (minor) advances in Afghanistan, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I support the Taliban over the west since 1996, I mean which one stopped child prostitution and opium production?

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

rolling my fucking eyes. The west literally created the Taliban

permalink
report
parent
reply

They funded it’s predecessor to fight the Soviets and it immediately started fighting the USA when they kicked the Soviets out. Enemy of my enemy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah alright they may have reduced women to the level of animals at best but they stopped opium production so that’s cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Smdh when did the Taliban become political?

permalink
report
reply

imho this where they went wrong

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Very healthy dose on skepticism but cool.

permalink
report
reply
45 points
*

i have 0 faith in this lol, they just want to make sure there is not any retaliatory action

permalink
report
reply
30 points

No faith in it, but saying good things is the first step. I, for one, would be completely unsurprised if it turns out the coverage of the Taliban over the past few decades has not exactly been accurate and up to date.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

the coverage of the Taliban over the past few decades has not exactly been accurate and up to date.

What are you talking about they have only been a thing for a few decades, they were in government less than 20 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah, that’s what I meant – going back to the 90s is “a few” decades."

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I mean, yeah, but still a change of face from the riders of the apocalypse thing they had going on publicly in the 00’s. I’ve no doubt this is just them figuring out the western methods of exploitation with a likable public face.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah it’s 100% just rhetoric. This is the type of thing everyone says when they’re trying to transition from being a militant group to being a peacetime government. It’s good rhetoric though, I’ll give them that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points
*

I sure fucking hope so

Edit:

Women are going to be very active in the society but within the framework of Islam

This is the key. In their interpretation of Islam, what, exactly are women’s rights?

permalink
report
reply
30 points

To be property. But prized property.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Islamophobia but okay

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*

The question was about “their interpretation of Islam”. The Taliban have a fundamentalist interpretation of Islam that is very repressive towards women.

Edit: Oh, 15 hour old account, okay I see, go have your fun

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

wow I can’t believe a 1600 year old religion might have regressive views on women

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

fart noises

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

of course the taliban supports women’s rights. women’s right to shut the fuck up

permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 198

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 428K

    Comments