It’s kinda scary how finance and payment processing companies can just destroy a company and a whole bunch of people’s livelihoods by themselves just because they decide they don’t like what they sell, and have no oversight whatsoever preventing them from doing this.

37 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
26 points

It’s not a lot, but it’s weird it happened twice

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Won’t be the last time it’ll happen either. Sex workers building up institutional power is very disruptive and tends to put power the hands of The Wrong People

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I feel like they’re welcome among the MLs here on hexbear. but I am trying to be less “online” and maybe that’s the key descriptor

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

? I’ve never seen or met an ML that didn’t acknowledge that sex work is labor and should be organized accordingly

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Its rare but I’ve bumped into like two who were worryingly concerned about “moral removed” or whatever… Only online though.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I’ve gotten into arguments with dudes at genzodong and moretankiechapo back in the day. I assume their young but some internet mls def have trouble separating the industry from worker with respect to sex work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

There are MLs who come to it because it says it’s practical and theoretical, and then there are MLs who like it because they heard it was authoritarian but had free stuff, and you can usually tell which are which.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

we’re all whores, we just sell different parts

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Our comrades at corner spati had an episode talking to sex workers and their issues with payments and legality. Onlyfans gone will prolly be big blow, they also talked about crypto being not a great solution, but a solution :sadness:

permalink
report
reply
18 points

FWIW, the gun nuts have also been dealing with similar issues and threats thereof. This issue may be new to many of us, but it is not new.

permalink
report
reply

Same thing happened with weed shops in California after it became legal (and is still happening). You have to pay in cash. You can use cards but they charge you an ATM fee and give you change back from the nearest $5 interval.

All because finance institutions don’t want to touch those transactions.

permalink
report
reply
27 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There’s a 0.0% of the Feds seizing a major bank’s funds because it’s from weed sales. They don’t do it because the bank owners also don’t want weed to be legal - Capitalist class solidarity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Yeah, OP has a very good point, but a lot of private sector decisions like this are partly (and in some cases, mostly) driven by the risk of operating in legal grey areas. It’s the same process by which sanctions that technically allow food, medicine, etc. have the practical effect of choking those things off (banks don’t want to run the risk of financing something that falls outside what’s legal and getting assets frozen/seized).

Of course there’s plenty to be said about the massive influence private companies have in writing laws in the first place, what laws the government chooses to enforce, and what laws private companies choose to flout.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

There’s a reason banks have giant departments dedicated just to compliance and internal audits. It’s certainly not out of the goodness of their hearts

permalink
report
parent
reply