Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
2 points

can’t they just print the money? i don’t get why debt is a problem for this case

permalink
report
reply
4 points

The article gives a few reasons, one being that private lenders tend to tighten up when inflation is rising because they realize that businesses won’t be able to grow at a sufficient rate for them to make a return.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They are against using deficit to improve productive forces or provide for welfare. See how they mentioned mandatory spending (referring to social security).

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Unfortunately this is about the federal government’s “debt,” which is a red herring, and not the country’s international balance of payments deficit.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

It’s true that they can just print money here, but this leads to secondary effects that the article touches on. Specifically, increased currency volume tends to mean devaluation leading to private lenders to tighten up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If they print enough of it without shredding any through taxation, yes, but I think this is commonly overblown so Congress can claim they can’t pay for stuff, except of course for military stuff. This article was timed for Congress to make spending decisions; they come out every cycle. Congressional leaders announce an agreement on spending levels, a key step to averting shutdown

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Right, as far as public spending goes there isn’t really a problem. They can print to an infinite amount because the debt is in their own currency, and as long as you print the currency, you can print however much you want. There’s never going to be a default because the fed can just create more credit. The government can always pay its debt by simply printing the money.

The problem for the US economy lies with private debt that is leading to a default. Creditors are tightening their lending which is leading VC funded businesses to crash. Meanwhile, individuals become increasingly unable to service their debts, we’re seeing them being forced to forfeit their property. Private banks that are holding debt also end up with bad debt as a result. This sort of dynamic is precisely what we saw leading up to the 2008 crisis. We’re now seeing similar things happening, but on a much bigger scale.

permalink
report
parent
reply

yea also, U.S. is like the only country which doesn’t need to worry about balance of payments. You see this with how every other country’s current account deficit is shown in U.S. Dollars instead of the local currency.

of course, there are very good reasons to not have a current account deficit. self reliance and all (plus the dollar slowly losing its status)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The last President with a balanced budget was Clinton. If Republicans cared about a balanced budget so much, why aren’t they asking him how he did it?

permalink
report
reply

Also don’t forget that Clinton’s “balanced” budget came at the cost of austerity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

100% tax on any amount greater than $999,999,999 and also tax the churches.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

The thought of taxing churches makes me warm inside

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@lemmy.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 19

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 6.4K

    Comments