inside every liberal lives a petty fascist

title edited to remove any insinuation that Sherman committed war crimes during the civil war

51 points
*

sherman did some fucked things (like slaughtering the indigenous) but he did do an order that would have redistributed land to black people but was vetoed by Andrew Johnson and the order rescinded

no mules, though, just 40 acres per family

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Tilling 40 acres by hand :sweat:

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Tilling disrupts the soil micro biome and is good to avoid if possible

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Was going to say that I thought even stuff like the 3 sisters required tilling with the tech at the time, but found this https://lilliehouse.blogspot.com/2017/05/no-till-no-spray-3-sisters-garden-corn.html

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

I mean, the Confederacy was run by a gang of the most reactionary, racist slavers imagineable so…

permalink
report
reply
41 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
21 points

Jokes about terror on fascist population are only funny if they are about people far away sweaty

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I don’t think this rat gives a shit about MTG being fascistic. this is more like some EU neolib threatening to shell the UK over brexit. be as racist as you want just don’t threaten my precious union

permalink
report
parent
reply

So , in this analogy UK sells Humans as Property ? and Left the Union because of this … ?

Where do I sign up for the Chevauchée

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

we’re talking about current day republicans. stop trying to force a square dunk into a round net

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Sherman didn’t go far enough.

permalink
report
reply
27 points
*

Sherman was a genocidal imperialist monster.

He murdered the confederate slavers with regret (Sherman was anti-abolition, pro-slavery and sympathised with the the slavers up until it became a matter of armed rebellion) because they opposed the US empire then spent the next two decades years commanding far larger armies to do far worse with far more glee (he was an ardent political advocate of manifest destiny and wars of extermination) to the native people of the Americas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Again bad people can do good things while being criticized for the bad they did. To frame his actions against the south as war crimes diminishes the actual war crimes he committed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

Yeah, I see him kind of as a Churchill figure.

He was briefly on the right side for the wrong reasons, and yeah it’s good the Nazis lost, but they probably would have lost without him too, and the world would still have been a better place if he (or someone who fulfilled his roles) had never existed.

And what Sherman did in the south was, explicitly the prototype of the strategies he used as the united state’s General of the Armies against in the following two decades of genocidal warfare. I feel it’s relevant to bring up when people say “Sherman should have gone further” because he did. He went far far further, against people who did far less to deserve it.

The US (inarguably in Sherman’s time), was a genocidal empire. Sherman was a member of that genocidal empire’s ruling class and commander of its armies. I find it incredibly 😬 when people keep bringing up so positively that one time he helped put down a reactionary rebellion in that empire, even positively characterising that empire for putting down that rebellion (when people talk about “the union” here it’s almost always positively), without contextualizing it in any way.

I get the feeling that it stems in part from a place of trying to own the reactionaries, US megachuds can get mad about/concern troll about Sherman so there’s an instinct to take the other side, and in part from people desperately trying to find something in the US national mythos they can still relate to, and I can understand both of those, but I think there’s still harm in it both from the misinformation standpoint that people who just read social media/look at memes can come away with a dangerously flawed historical misunderstanding of Sherman/Union == cool and based and from the standpoint that it can be extremely alienating both for native american people to see a genocidaire lionised and just people who’ve been hurt by US imperialism to see purported comrades engaging with/propogating US national mythos, in the same ways that lionising churchill can be harmful and alienating to victims of british imperialism, so although I get no-one here supports the native american genocides or the people who did them and I understand being scolded feels shitty and I’ve still been pushing back whenever I see it here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The entire point of the Civil War was a struggle over who would get to do “Manifest Destiny” - the slave states or the free ones. People were opposed to slavery in the North in large part because they were nervous about plantation owners stealing all that juicy Native-controlled land.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

complain about sherman being a fash to defend Marjory Taylor Green in the process, galaxy brain shit OP foh

permalink
report
reply
3 points

jesse what the fuck are you talking about

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@hexbear.net

Create post

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we’re all comrades here.

Community stats

  • 107

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 127K

    Comments