36 points

Lol I honestly reflexively don’t believe stories about Chinese or Russian military tech. It serves all parties to lie, for China they can talk about tech superiority, America has an excuse to funnel more money to the military.

permalink
report
reply

It’s funny once you start seeing the parallels between military reporting and those political campaign emails you get if you’ve ever gotten on one of their lists. The fluctuation between smug satisfactory glee and panicked doomsaying. They hit 2 different target audiences. The people who want to donate to winners for clout in their administration & the people who vote out of fear of the enemy and panic.

Same goes for these articles. Panicked ones about how we are losing are sob stories to get more military funding. Gloating smug articles outlining overconfident plans appeal to the warhawks who vicariously gain happiness from victory in their nation’s campaign (think about the Iraq War articles with the details of how we would win in 1 month).

permalink
report
parent
reply

This one I believe. China has been saying they had this tech for a decade and it makes sense they’d investigate it. If the US was looking into these kinds of weapons it wouldn’t be able to justify endless naval spending on big ass boats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

The primary reason this matters is because it makes the Pacific fleet about as dangerous as a bunch of row boats.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

:xicko:

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
3 points

paper tiger

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

:bloomer:

permalink
report
reply

wholesome

permalink
report
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 198

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 428K

    Comments