Permanently Deleted

16 points

Seems straightforward lib shit to me.

I’m not aware of how big DFW is in leftist circles, but do people take him for a leftist?

permalink
report
reply

He’s not a leftist by any means. He was a flawed and broken person that wrote some interesting stuff, but was probably liberal by default.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah I’m just wondering because I’ve seen it implied that he might have been leftist. I’ve read enough of DFW and he always had a bit of a conservative streak about him. The individual always loomed large in his writings because he seemed to have an affinity for solipsism as an explainer for the societal predicament we’re all mired in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You should read the piece he did on John McCain in 2000 for Rolling Stone. That’s the one piece that always stuck with me in regards to DFW, and how his writing almost always gets bogged down to the ‘individual’, instead of focusing on the more systematic nature as to why a guy like McCain could be principled in one respect, but a craven individual as a politician. The idea is that maybe a guy like McCain deserves a chance, deserves a vote, because he refused freedom to stay with the rest of the POWs. What’s completely glossed over is that McCain didn’t have any qualms about serving in the war, and spent the rest of his life restating the belief that it was a just war. DFW then has a bit of a moral crisis towards the end of the article, as it becomes more and more apparent that McCain is…a politician. So what does it mean? It means that we should keep in mind both of these sides of John McCain, and what it means to us as individuals.

The end of the article is so ridiculously meek, and really just emblematic of liberal dead ends. And honestly this evasiveness seems to be in all of DFW’s works. It’s a shame because he really was an amazing writer. I have to wonder if his suicide had something to do with the sense of futility that seemed to litter his writings, even as he sensed that the capitalist order sucked and maybe we should be more emphatic.

Be warned, the article is super long

permalink
report
parent
reply

i also recommend his 9/11 article

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Being anti-capitalist is completely compatible with being a lib. It’s like a release valve for them.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Being anti-capitalist is completely compatible with being a lib.

New hexbear.net tagline

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

he wrote that book that rich people pretend to read instead of pretending to read theory

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He’s kinda lib but his stuff is still worth reading for entertainment. I’m reading one of his essays about a cruise ship and it’s very funny. Chuckling a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean I’m not a smart published author but this is flawed and lib thinking. When you don’t vote, you don’t vote, end of story. You’re not tacitly doubling some frothing fash’s vote for Trump, your withholding your support for bourgeois electoral politics. He’s even admitting in the first sentence that the establishment is indeed entrenched, so, why, would someone want to vote for that then when they can correctly see the problem?

permalink
report
reply
27 points

sounds like DFW can’t conceive of change outside of voting

permalink
report
reply

That’s basically it, he’s pissy people aren’t voting, dude think, please, shake off the liberalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

what’s the fucking alternative, david? conflict with the state? be my fucking guest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Anybody who’s shitting on one hitters is about to catch these hands, that was my primary way of getting stoned for years

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply