Onion articles are writing itself: Western Military Observers shocked that Russians are not commiting war crimes like they did in Iraq and Afghanistan. - When we were in Middle East, we started to wreck shit up, shelling with depleted uranium, bombing villages. I’m suprised that Russian are such weak bitches - retired col. said. - My men have PTSD and are homeless but at least we protected special interests of Oil Companies and the ruling class.

33 points

If Russians are so weak then no need for NATO right?

permalink
report
reply
30 points
*

say their opinion of Russia’s military abilities has gone down.

Wasn’t there some post/comment earlier this week mentioning that the Russian military forces going in first were going in with greener troops and older gear? I mean, the stuff I was driving around in Iraq during the 2003 invasion was ancient.

Ukraine’s defense forces, bolstered by civilian volunteers, have managed to keep Russian forces from overrunning Ukraine’s two biggest cities, although the on-the-ground fighting has moved closer to those locations.

Reading between the lines, Russian forces aren’t yet doing a mass causality event to take those cities.

The sources pointed out just how shocked many in the broader NATO military community were at how incompetent Russian soldiers appeared, especially the officer and non-commissioned officer corps. Many described the professionalism and efficiency of the entire Russian military operations in Ukraine as unimpressive and sloppy.

Nothing in the article explains why they have come to this opinion.

Ukrainian military is publishing videos claiming to show their successful attacks, which have been incredibly valuable for morale and drawing support from

Yeah, that’s just propaganda. You don’t show the bad things until after the war is over. Don’t tell the soldiers on the front lines that they are about to get rolled up because they are expected to stand their ground to slow enemy troops, have them use up supplies and reduce their numbers through causalities/fatalities.

Another way to read this article… this means that all of the NATO/USA anti-Russian propaganda about how the Russian military is some big scary thing waiting to gobble up Europe… was a lie to justify NATO expansion, military buildups, etc. The Russian military might be little different then any other large modern military, a few units and their victories are doing the heavy lifting for the reputation of the military as a whole.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

I’m seeing mostly T-72s and light vehicles in the “Ukraine destroys armoured column” vids, only one or two T80s, all older, no T90s so far.

Apparently, there are mostly Su27s and older bombers in the air, though I have no idea how you could tell a 27 from a 35 from grainy phone footage. It’s hard enough to differentiate T72s from T90s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

There is a mix of old and new equipment. From what we see most of their tanks seem to be T-72B3s alongside older models such as the T-72A and T-72AV (which seem to be used for rear echelon troops). I’ve seen pictures of a single T-90 and a video of a T-80BVM (apparently, hard to confirm) which suffered an internal detonation which separated the turret from the hull.

Their IFVs and APCs are also mixed equipment, MT-LBs from the 60s as well as BMP-1s, a couple of BMP-2 which is still reliable in today’s battlefield but very few modern armored transports so far.

They’ve also held their strategic bomber fleet back, so no Tu-160s. As for their rocket and missile artillery, they’re using Kalibr and Iskanders… which are pretty new.

And this is the so-called military disappointment, a regular army that is advancing on another regular army with mostly late soviet era tech… and in two or three days it managed to reach the capital and make a series of breakthroughs in the south and east without fully deploying it’s firepower and being quite soft with it’s artillery.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t know if there is much of a practical difference between their T72s and newer tanks under the conditions they are fighting in right now. They aren’t facing peer armor very much.

It was old Soviet doctrine to use the older T55s and such ahead of the newer T62s, T64s , and T72s for similar reasons. So this is to be expected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Another military source told VICE News that officials and analysts within the U.S. military were “psyched” to see what types of weapons and hardware their Russian adversaries are using and how their airstrike tradecraft and radar systems work.

Fucking jizzing in their pants over death and destruction

permalink
report
reply
18 points

The Russian military that basically paused operations for negotiations for half of the invasion so far? lol

Also hilarious that these are all anonymous sources.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Anonymous NATO sources at that

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

oh cool i guess thats why they arent circling kiev and kharkiv, ukraines two biggest cities, as we speak

permalink
report
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 198

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 428K

    Comments