:nuke:
Friendly reminder that the original function of a castle was as a base of operations to loot, rape, and kill your neighbors.
So…
They also serve as a passive invasion deterrent. If an enemy army enters your land you retreat to your castles. The enemy now faces a choice: do they invest each castle or pass them by. If they pass them the soldiers in the castle can ride out and harass your foragers. If you lay siege to the castle and a rival army shows up, the enemy is now between the hammer and the anvil.
Not saying you’re wrong, I just fuckin’ love the history of castles.
“We’re proud to introduce Drawbridge Dash! The latest gig-based free market solution. Peasants work as contractors with their own weapons, armor, and lives so there’s no need to maintain a population of them. Simply offer just enough money to keep enough of them fighting for you as needed!”
Real reason being that castles became obsolete in the face of increasingly powerful weaponry.
Also the whole meaning behind the phrase “where will you hide?” is because there is NOWHERE they can hide in the event of revolution. If a bunch of rich people tried to bunker up in some redoubt somewhere it is at best self imprisonment. Let alone they could just be starved out assuming the revolutionaries couldn’t breach their defenses (which they inevitably would).
Somebody should tell the billionaires that’re planning to hide in New Zealand that underground bunkers still have air intake pipes to stop the underground residents from passing away of asphyxiation.
Damn you, Xanatoss!
