Permanently Deleted

2 points

I think increasing the age makes more sense.

Registry and bans are stupid and just more ways for the oligarchy to control the people. They do want the populace disarmed, easier to enslave that way.

Frontal lobe doesn’t finish developing until age 25, it affects decision-making, empathy. Younger ages are thus less able to control behavior. There are also hormonal differences in brain development which could be considered. Socialisation is also a factor.

Perhaps also change the age at which people are legally considered/charged as adults, since the brain is not fully developed at all at age 18 (or even younger, some children are charged as adults in court). Younger people’s brains are more malleable than adults - there is a greater possibility of reduced recidivism and change in behavior for them that should be recognized in sentencing.

Raising the drinking and smoking age to 21 has had a positive impact, I don’t see why it wouldn’t work great for gun violence as well.

But I think there should also be less glorification of violence in culture (especially that accessible to kids) - that has a big impact on whether they see it as acceptable to commit violence, such as gun violence.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

A better busybox (bussybox?) would be to push school shootings as a mental health issue:

  1. It sometimes (often?) is one,
  2. It has a chance of putting chuds in an awkward spot, and
  3. More access to mental healthcare is good for all sorts of reasons.
permalink
report
reply
4 points

The problem is then the libs will just push to disarm everyone who has ever seen a therapist or taken an antidepressant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Seems pretty reasonable to me.

Probably should pick 20 or 22 or even 21 and a half instead though. Making the day you can legally purchase a firearm the same as the day you can legally start drinking seems like a bad combination.

permalink
report
reply

It seems like a good afternoon

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

That was misstated, but other people’s liability can vary wildly from state to state, and there have certainly been several where the gun is legally purchased. No statistically appreciable number of people come back to shoot their school up three years later.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t disagree, but unless the left can start successfully crafting for this issue some kind of busybox for the libs, then right now it’s looking like we get stuck with a registry or worse. What’s our alternative? Who’s going to say anything? The NRA?

permalink
report
parent
reply

guns

!guns@hexbear.net

Create post

“Under no pretext"

Rules (Under review):

    1. NO BUYING, SELLING OR TRADING of guns or accessories. Take that to Reddit and /r/GunAccessoriesForSale or Armslist.com
    1. Censor all personally identifiable information in posts including serial numbers on firearms.
    1. Any post or comment advocating illegal action will be removed and the poster warned. A second infraction will result in a ban.
    1. Unironically suggesting the SKS as a usable rifle in the 21st Century when there are things like the AK and AR that cost only a bit more might result in a ban, it depends on how we feel.
    1. Discussion of hunting is acceptable but please put “CW: hunting” in post titles. Debating the ethicality of hunting is also fine, but keep it civil and don’t derail other people’s threads.

Community stats

  • 5

    Monthly active users

  • 4.7K

    Posts

  • 7.9K

    Comments