These people are scum.

https://thehill.com/policy/international/580102-democrats-call-on-biden-to-sanction-climate-change-contributors/

https://www.markey.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/markey_letter_to_treasury_re_climate_sanctions.pdf

Combined with additional climate diplomacy with key countries like China, financial sanctions would ensure that addressing the climate crisis remains at the center of U.S. foreign and national security strategy.

Signed by:

Edward J. Markey

Veronica Escobar

Bernard Sanders

Elizabeth Warren

Literally only the four of them. This wasn’t even just some “sign on to whatever” thing. They specifically used their “progressive” cred to attack China and promote the use of economic sanctions.

77 points

lmao, China, the only country that has met their meager Paris Accord agreements (and a few years earlier than target at that). Yea, ok, nothing ‘cold war’ about that at all.

permalink
report
reply
23 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

They also have a pretty good track record when it comes to actually meeting the goals they set.

Meanwhile, the ministry of transportation in my country has guidelines that they should abide by the Paris Accord, but as them how they reconcile that with the fact that they’re planning to build more highways and its crickets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
  1. Bernie Sanders has always been a social imperialist. He supported the invasion of Afghanistan. He supported the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia. :astronaut-1:

  2. Vijay Prashad tears apart this imperialist bullshit of blaming China for climate change.

The United States, 4-5% of the world’s population, still uses 25% of the world’s resources. You outsource production to China, and then you say “China is the carbon polluter!” China is producing your buckets. China is producing your nuts and bolts. China is producing your phones. Try to produce it in your own countries and see your carbon emissions rise!

permalink
report
reply

The United States, 4-5% of the world’s population, still uses 25% of the world’s resources

Holy fuck I’ve somehow never seen this statistic before and death to america

permalink
report
parent
reply

and our corporations in the US urge the workers to blame themselves. for this “25%” of the world’s resources. They say to the American worker "You consume too much. You don’t recycle enough. You don’t drive a good enough vehicle. " And while that may be partly true, and there are small choices we can make to improve the state of our “carbon footprint” that is mostly bullshit to let the rich off the hook. The military is the biggest polluter. The rich consume far more than the workers. The bourgeois-run city governments refuse to invest in public transportation. They refuse to make walkable cities with mixed-use residential zones. They insist on car-centered design and suburban sprawl. They insist on a culture single-family home ownership. Bosses shame workers for not owning their own vehicle. Most of the recycling that gets picked up never actually gets recycled, it gets incinerated. If it does get recycled, the recycling process is often very destructive to the environment. The supermarkets throw out millions of tons of expired food and lock the dumpsters to keep out homeless people and price gouge. There is a refusal to reduce emissions or transition to green energy. All of the problems with America’s consumption of resources are systemic, and the system is run by the bourgeoisie, and is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. So telling people that the solution is putting out their recycling and driving a tesla is absurd.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

:gold-communist:

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They say to the American worker "You consume too much. You don’t recycle enough. You don’t drive a good enough vehicle.

And they say it in ads to sell you more shit to consume

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

You outsource production to China, and then you say “China is the carbon polluter!”

Funny how that is always conveniently left out

permalink
report
parent
reply

Bernie was always the compromise candidate

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Try to produce it in your own countries and see your carbon emissions rise!

Honestly, the one hope I have for the future is that China decarbonizes the economy that all the western nations manufacturer out of.

God forbid Americans bring their industry home under current leadership. We’ll be draining mercury into our aquafiers and stuffing our vacant skyscrapers with pig shit before the turn of the next decade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Someone upvote me I wanna post something. Fuck Bernie, Soc-dems killed Rosa

permalink
report
reply
51 points

china is literally building more sustainable low carbon energy development than most the world combined and youre sanctioning them?

what a dumbass

permalink
report
reply
35 points

Yeah it’s like dealing with climate change can’t even be the goal of this request. It’s literally just to slow China’s rise. The article doesn’t mention any of the like 20 different countries that pollute more per-capita, even though some of them, like Japan, Germany, South Korea, etc. have much higher per-capita emissions, and a lot of countries that are higher don’t produce nearly as much value as China does from their manufacturing. What value does the US or Germany provide to the world that requires such high CO2 usage?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

What value does the US or Germany provide to the world that requires such high CO2 usage?

Uhhh excuse me, but have you considered how people are supposed to live without financial derivative products and Marvel movies?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

While it is promising that the PRC announced it will stop building coal-fired projects in other countries, the PRC is the largest emitter of global carbon emissions, and the United States must work to ensure that its development finance institutions do not undermine global de- carbonization efforts

wtf wtf wtf

textbook social imperialism.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

“the PRC is the largest emitter of global carbon emissions”*

*if you ignore the united states military (we do)

permalink
report
parent
reply

they aren’t even taking into account

  1. per capita emissions (per capita, USA and Saudis are by far the worst)

  2. the fact that China manufactures a huge percentage of America’s consumer goods

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Um hey Mr. China, your money is doing good and we need you to stop that. Please think of the polar bears.

Thanks - The West

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@hexbear.net

Create post

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we’re all comrades here.

Community stats

  • 107

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 127K

    Comments