12 points

depleted qranium :kelly:

permalink
report
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
spoiler

Thank you for spoilering

permalink
report
parent
reply

another fun fact

all music encoded in lossy formats such as mp3 before 2009 has degraded into a virtually unlistenable state
for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA - it’s about 4kbps on SSDs, due to rotational velocidensity.

always encode your music in lossless formats like FLAC only download FLAC music dont listen to streams that dont deliver FLAC they will lose their quality

permalink
report
reply
4 points

:downbear: no it isn’t, stop making shit up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Oh shit. All of my band’s music from school is gone now then rip

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

the message you responded to was bullshit

permalink
report
parent
reply

for each year the MP3 sits on your hard drive, it will lose roughly 12kbps, assuming you have SATA

Heard this can also vary depending on whether your SATA is 1.5/3/6 Gbits/sec as well as the age of the drive (platter spin speed and whatnot) - in general I recommend just keeping the “two in the bush one in the air” adage in mind. personally I like to have physical music, and then FLAC copies on my personal PC & mirrored onto my NAS!

Godspeed! :rat-salute:

permalink
report
parent
reply

(Nobody fall for these trolls, I have no idea what the technical literacy rate is on this forum)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Frank record data. Frank use stone tablet. Stone tablet not degrade on human time scale. Stone tablet not ideal from data density perspective. Stone tablet have long read and write times. Stone tablet cause silicosis of the lungs during write process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

NGL this kinda sounds bullshit, unless you’re reencoding or compressing the file over and over I don’t think magnetic orientation errors or general entropy leads to that much degradation. At worst a few bits get flipped and a CRC fails or something. But also in the process of typing this I realized this might just be a bit and I’m making this comment for nothing idk. :shrug-outta-hecks:

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yeah regardless of the hardware side, lossy vs lossless compression has nothing to do with losing data over time, even if you use lossless very high quality encoding if the data’s getting corrupted it doesn’t matter if it wasn’t compressed, you’re losing the data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yeah, but will that last 20% require exponentially increasing amounts of co2 production until life on the planet is destroyed and thus ensuring the supply won’t be exhausted?

permalink
report
reply
9 points
*

It does not, unfortunately. They should really get on that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

lol ok you got me, I had to look up whether they had designed it so badly

permalink
report
reply