I don’t hate myself enough to delve deep into the depp/heard lore. I see that people seem to think he’s absolved, is that real? Do they both suck equally? Tell me how to feel, fellow echo chamber members!

This shit pisses me off, and it know it really shouldn’t because both Johnny and Amber are rich asshole celebrities who I will never meet, and will only ever see in increasingly shitty movies. It’s pretty clear from the legal case in :ukkk: that Johnny Depp married a woman 23 years his junior, and then proceeded to beat the shit out of her. The people who are like “I’m a feminist, but I thought that Amber got what she deserved because she was a manipulative gold digger” can fuck off.

permalink
report
reply
54 points

:this:

The recent suit wasn’t even about who abused whom (courts had already found Depp guilty of this) it was about whether or not an article that Heard wrote about being a victim of abuse was defamation, despite not mentioning Depp — people treat it like the former and not the latter and keep doing the enlightened centrism thing of “they’re both shitty” which isn’t the point here

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Amber.

permalink
report
parent
reply

read the room Amber_Bot

permalink
report
parent
reply

I used to not care and then I realized that the way Depp is suing Heard for defamation also sets a precedent for talking about abuse you suffered being something you’re civilly liable for

Upon further research Depp is a real scumbag. The Manson Salo thing is the most obvious example to point to

permalink
report
reply

This shit was definitely glommed on to by people with an axe to grind about metoo.

permalink
report
parent
reply

This stuff is a pretty transparently part of the reaction against metoo yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Yeh, I aggressively do not care but it’s come across my radar so many times I feel like I need a cookie cutter response next time someone talks about it in front of me and I just refuse to sit through 10 billion hours or depositions or whatever the fuck

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It seems most people thought he sued her for abuse. If he did, then the case would probably be less ugly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Pretty clear Johnny Depp hired a PR firm to swing public opinion back to his side

I don’t know anything about the actual court case but anyone who tries to tell me how to think can eat shit and die :hst-gun:

permalink
report
reply
14 points

all that reddit shit has to be astroturfed

permalink
report
parent
reply

Reddit, YouTube, twitter. One day I woke up and my YouTube suggestions was an endless field of “Amb*r heard EMBARASSED in court”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

As far as I’ve absorbed from osmosis though it wasn’t just public opinion, he was also legally absolved? If im wrong I’d love to get a straight answer about it. Even “feminists” I know have told me they’re on his side

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Legally, he got a small slap on the wrist, whereas Amber got hit with with a pretty big fine. Specifically (only know this after looking it up now) Amber got awarded $2mil, and Depp got $15mil.

But the whole trial wasn’t about abuse, it was about defamation. It seems like they both suck and were shitty to each other, and just because it was ‘proven’ that Amber lied about about some of the abuse doesn’t necessarily prove anything about any of her other statements. Even libs who 100% trust US courts can’t lean on it for a verdict about abuse when that’s not what the trial was about.

I’ve seen people say “Oh, but he hit her once, he’d have lost the trial so hard!” to mean that he’s innocent, but I don’t find that very convincing. From what I’ve seen, I think its pretty obvious he was also abusive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Amber.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A ton of people assumed this was some kind of weird criminal-but-civil case where it was about proving or disproving abuse, rather than disputing allegedly-spurious accusations against Depp in a publication. Heard being found liable for defamation with regards to some specific claims made in a public article does not, in any way, mean that Depp did not abuse her, only that the abuse alleged in the publication specified was portrayed in a way that was, to some degree, knowingly false. Regardless of someone being abusive, legally speaking in the US, you can’t lie about what they did in a public space to disparage them, even if they’re a rotten person that deserves to be made a pariah.

If a hypothetical spouse of mine cheated on me and stole my money from my bank account before eloping, I can’t disparage them by going to local media and claiming they, like, poisoned neighborhood dogs as a hobby. That’s a pretty hyperbolic example, but hopefully that makes sense.

People, especially dipshits with axes to grind about MeToo and women in videogames, are not going to be interested in accepting that nuanced, but nonetheless critical distinction, and want to declare Depp innocent of all accusations of abuse, which is not at all what was determined in this case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah that’s how PR astroturfing bullshit works - it gives people a vague sense of what “the truth” is without actually telling them any of the details. Notice that feminists you know have told you they’re on his side without actually telling you anything meaningful about the case.

Like I said, I don’t know what happened, and I don’t care to know, either. But I know how to smell bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply

According to British courts he beat his spouse. I’m not a fan.

permalink
report
reply
45 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 125

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments