Who has the recs?

16 points
*

Feminism for the 99% if you want I can let you borrow it next time I see you, totally random hexbear user whom I’ve definitely never met in real life.

permalink
report
reply

:meow-hug: That’d be swell! Just started Jakarta Method today, so I’ll be working through that for a bit.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Good read! Sad, but necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

:fry:

permalink
report
parent
reply

Have you been missing the Hexbear meetups? There’s posters all over Quantico advertising them, they’re hard to miss.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They’re good fun, I made us all pancakes last time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

@Owl - any recs? You always come to mind as a comrade with a good understanding of feminism.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

reaper_cushions already recommended “Women, Race, and Class” by Angela Davis, which is the big one.

I would also recommend the ShitRedditSays recommended reading list, which is a nice collection of short and effective articles, by the people I learned feminism from. They have links to longer essays from the 101 links. The only caveat is that it says you should read the ShitRedditSays FAQ first, which you don’t, because they haven’t been relevant in nearly a decade.

Also it’s a mixed bag of whether you’ll get Marxist-feminism or not there. The short version is that class struggle fits inside intersectionality theory, and class is just another axis of oppression within the kyriarchy (although the biggest one by a lot). That’s a lot of jargon right now, but when you see these terms defined and wonder how they fit with class, just come back to that description. Nesting the theories this way works very well, and they’re very compatible when composed this way.

(Often I find that people are hostile to Marxist-feminism, because they see treating intersectionality as the more general one as somehow robbing the prestige of Marxism, and how can this squishy thing by girls be more important than the immortal science? And if you find that you’re one of those people, it’d be good to spend some time unpacking your assumptions.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

One thing I would strongly recommend is being wary of anything that is second wave feminism or earlier. The majority of 1st and 2nd wave western feminist movements were white and cishet centered. They were largely focused on getting access to the power structures of patriarchy and imperialism for white cishet women instead of true liberation.

There are also a lot of issues in second wave feminism around viewing masculinity and men as somehow inherently evil, which is total bullshit and leads to bizarre reactionary concepts like “political lesbianism” and TERFs.

I’m sure there is some interesting work in there if you can read it critically, but I view it as having minimal modern use in comparison to modern intersectional feminism.

permalink
report
reply

:fidel-salute-big: Thank you again comrade! Appreciate the lesson!

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

You’re welcome! That’s definitely a summarized explanation, but I want to make sure you engage with theory understanding that context. Unsurprisingly, intersectionality is essential for liberation.

:feminism:

permalink
report
parent
reply

Harry Potter and the Chosen TERFS.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Just looking at my bookshelf:

Women, Race and Class and Whipping Girl have both been mentioned but I’ll reiterate those.

All of Alexandra Kollontai’s writings are really good, if a bit outdated in terms of sex work and women’s roles as mothers.

Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale by Maria Mies is a good intro to Marxist feminism

Ain’t I a Woman by Bell Hooks is a good black feminist perspective, as is Sister Outsider by Audre Lord

Leslie Feinberg’s works are all great, and while they’re focused on trans issues they intersect a lot with feminism.

permalink
report
reply