Removing rocks from the stream bed or stream edge to stack or throw can be aesthetically pleasing, but very damaging to the habitat you remove them from in both the short and long term. In the short term you are altering water currents, potentially speeding up certain areas and slowing down others which not only displaces wildlife in both of those areas, but may result in neither being suitable for habitation. It also creates a cascading effect in water flow, causing sediment to settle in areas of what is now slow flow and increasing erosion in areas of high speed flow. This disturbs the physical environment of the waterway, as well as its chemical (nutrient), chronological (change over time) development, and oxygenation.

In the long term, moving rocks brings about another issue, which is erosion. All waterways are shaped by erosion, and a rule in geology is the bigger the rock, the more force it takes to move. This rule is universal from boulders all the way down to individual clay particles. Your ability as a person to lift an even moderately sized rock has a monumental impact on the dynamics of the waterway. In some areas, a rock that may fit in just the palm of your hand might only be able to be moved by a once in a generation flood event. A stack of 3 or 4 of these rocks removes the equivalent of HUNDREDS of years of potential habitats, oxygen infusion into the water, or accelerates/decelerates the rate of erosion in the area you removed/added the rocks by hundreds of years. Simultaneously, you are impacting the riparian zone (edge of the waterway), an incredibly important habitat for terrestrial, aquatic, and amphibious plant and animal life. Changes erosion at the edge of a stream, river, or lake impact the whole body of water in all of the same ways as listed above.

Knowing when not to intervene is an equally important aspect of being a good steward to your natural environment as knowing when to intervene. Let nature do it’s thing and you’ll have even more beauty to enjoy when you are surrounded by it

45 points

and a rule in geology is the bigger the rock, the more force it takes to move

pretty much a rule everywhere tbh

permalink
report
reply

Always good to reiterate! Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

“Leave only footprints” makes sense to me.

permalink
report
reply
22 points
*

The beauty of nature is that it’s already beautiful and touching would diminish that. God/Universe/The Matrix’s Architect is like a zillion times better at beauty than man, you can’t improve it, leave it alone.

It’s okay to witness the marvel of the Earth and not tamper with. I have never understood why katz need to be touching stuff. I think it’s more than meaningful to take in the wonder of nature through senses and leave it at that. We can capture it’s magic through art and technology but just leave it alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Actually it’s not okay to witness the marvel of nature because actively seeing is interacting with it. We need most of the planet closed off to human interaction and that includes seeing. Of course I get a pass because I’m a conservationist but I’ll take many pictures, you can experience it in VR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

:data-laughing:

permalink
report
parent
reply

footprints with dead bugs squashed in them? stop walking on the nature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

Yes, a little known piece of history is that some areas we consider to be “natural” now have already been so deeply impacted by humans it’s shocking. Much of the east coast and some areas on the west coast basically had stream and river flow altered for hundreds of years by a single generation of clean cutting forests that increased runoff and washed away natural flow obstructions in waterways like logs and boulders. Like you said, salmon spawning in particular have been deeply impacted by this. IIRC not only does it give them less places to actually spawn, but it makes the journey far more difficult as they are fighting a faster water flow in a much more narrow waterway

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

:deeper-sadness:

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Are you a fellow full on restoration ecologist?

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

cars, wineries, landfills, zoos, concrete, sewers, cats. all of it more harmful that the innocent stone stacking children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

Some friends work a campground in western NC and it’s a big issue with campers setting the rocks up for photos and displacing hellbenders, which are both really cool and endangered.

I really like hellbenders so this pisses me off

permalink
report
reply

Yes, salamanders are a great example of how moving even a handful of rocks, something seemingly harmless, can have such a horrible impact. It changes the amount of dissolved oxygen, and as a result the salamanders in the immediate area and downstream can not survive. It’s very sad

permalink
report
parent
reply

What the fuck happened to Leave No Trace? And the losers who try to use Indigenous practices (PSA: Indigenous peoples aren’t a monolith and Indigenous peoples are composed of hundreds of numerous tribes and nations, many of which do not have rock stacking as a cultural practice btw) to justify their pathetic rock stacking need to be reminded that despoiling natural habitats and taking shit that doesn’t belong to you is peak colonizer behavior.

permalink
report
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Earth

!earth@hexbear.net

Create post

The world’s #1 planet!

A community for the discussion of the environment, climate change, ecology, sustainability, nature, and pictures of cute wild animals.

Socialism is the only path out of the global ecological crisis.

Community stats

  • 5

    Monthly active users

  • 2.1K

    Posts

  • 33K

    Comments