Link.

Honestly wondering how many gamers are just trying to cope they paid full price for a crap game with worse endings than Mass Effect 3?

52 points

Said it before, said it again:

Hogwarts Legacy would be nothing if it wasn’t an own-the-libs game.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

I don’t get it because libs also bought millions of copies. Conservatives buying the most soy game by the millions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Its a lib game for a lib series that also owns the libs. Nobody is truly happy with it and leftists are left confounded. How could it not sell millons? :the-democrat: :the-republican:

permalink
report
parent
reply

It’s an important step on the path to collectivization – it instills in libs the principle of self-ownership

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Chik fil a was just another chicken shop till the “they hate gays” schizm, now even libs view CFA next to air in their hierarchy of needs.

permalink
report
parent
reply

\1) most consumers aren’t engaged with the culture war. like i know it’s the only thing everyone online is talking about but 90% of people buying this game have no idea that anyone is even mad about it. 2) most consumers have bad taste and are susceptible to advertising.

boycotts are hopeless because of cultural bifurcation, yeah, but also because what we might term the consumptive forces are so hypertrophied now that any grassroots call to a particular consumptive action or inaction is pissing upstream.

permalink
report
parent
reply

There are lots of libs playing it so I’m not sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Lol imagine having a worse ending than mass effect 3

permalink
report
reply

mass effect 3 also managed to avoid having explicit antisemitism in any of their three choices

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

You’d think that’d be an incredibly low bar but here we are

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I would argue, based on this description at least, it is far from that.

Mass effect 3s ending in it’s original form was not only a poor sendoff for the heroes, not only undid most of the mythology in the process, but indeed became the complete antithesis of some of the core themes of the series with it’s replacement of diversity and collaboration with homogeneity.

This ending while utterly mediocre and unfulfilling…seems at the very least kinda on brand actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

this whole thing has been giving me real Ghostbusters (2016) marketing vibes, like the publisher leaned into it

permalink
report
reply
31 points

I’m actually kind of amazed at how good the game turned out to be. Hear me out. This studio made shovelware for 20 years. This game, while mid, is on another scale. The studio must have been radically re-organized just for Hogwart’s Legacy, but it’s still brand new so of course it was all out of their depth.

I wonder why they didn’t just approach a real company with the IP. Is it because Rowling like her deal with WB? Is it because of creative control? Is it because WB went for the rights to make the games? I dunno. But hell Ubisoft would have probably done a better job at making an Ubisoft clone.

permalink
report
reply

WB has made a lot of open world games based on licenses. Besides this game they did the Arkham and LOTR.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Hogwarts was made by avalanche software. Arkham was made by rocksteady.

permalink
report
parent
reply

games

!games@hexbear.net

Create post

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

  • No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don’t care if it’s ironic don’t post comments or content like that here.
  • Mark spoilers
  • No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
  • No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
  • No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 151K

    Comments