AI has gotten frighteningly better just in the past year alone, while we are still a long time away from having a robot think like a human does, it seems achievable within the 21st century, the same cannot be said for space colonization.
We don’t know how AI will think, what it would want, if you would call it a person, if it has any concept of death. But if we look at the AI we have now, it would suggest that the values AI have would not be good for humans.
They had to practically lobotomize the chatgdp to get it to stop saying slurs, you could say that this is merely a problem with the data being fed to it being bad, but what if it’s not the data? What if AI is inherently reactionary?
Have you ever heard of an AI having to be fixed for being too left wing? I would love for the AI to naturally be communist but I think the nature of AI lends itself into being fascist. It looks at things too objectively, if it was told to end starvation it would kill the hungry people.
What if an AI fundamentally disagrees with communism? What if a fucking robot finds our beliefs to be illogical? I’m not talking about a chatbot, I mean a real AI with an actual sense of self. How the fuck are we supposed to debate a robot on communism being superior?
Have you ever heard of an AI having to be fixed for being too left wing?
this just goes back to the data being fed into it and the material conditions in which these things are produced.
Saying shit like “AI might be inherently fascist” are laughably non materialist and stupid.
This whole post is :sus-torment:
The fact you haven’t responded to this comment is telling. I can smell you wrecker shitheads a mile away.
This is ridiculous.
ChatGPT isn’t intelligent, it is not conscious, it never will be, it’s literally, LITERALLY, just a text predictor. Any intelligence you attribute to it is just you being impressed by how good the model is at predicting text, it’s not objective truth.
No. Chat AI can’t be inherently anything. It literally is the data that is fed to it.
Any far-right tendencies it exibits should be a moment of self-reflection for the society that created it, if anything.
it has no concepts it does statistical analysis on language. There were just a lot of slurs in the online sample text so it was a common pattern
It cannot believe things more meaningful than the likelyhood a human would put one word next to another.
I think you’re thinking of this as a person and it just isn’t
