What are the skills and knowledge you could actually bring & fully realize at some point in the past?

And we’re taking this in the strictest, nerdiest, materialist lense. I don’t care how smart you are you ain’t making a steam engine the in bronze age, for instance.

So what could you create, with just your knowledge & period tools? What kind of institutional, technological, philosophical innovations could you realistically recreate? How would you interface with the social fabric of society to not be some crazed pariah who never positively influences the place they went?

24 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
15 points

c/truetheory

permalink
report
parent
reply

you are you ain’t making a steam engine the in bronze age

The romans built at least one.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

That was the Greeks, and it was regarded as a curiosity and certainly wouldn’t actually be effective as an engine.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The Romans had something similar, too, but it was also just regarded as a curiosity since the rich asshole class couldn’t see a way to turn an immediate profit off of it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uqPlOAH85o

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

thats just a doohickey :the-doohickey:

you need something that can outshine a mule or ox for it to be a useful transformative thing. and a kind of incentive structure that makes it exploding people every so often acceptable

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s pretty trivial to make one or direct someone to make one if you already know it can be done (and, of course, have a common language)

Even the layperson’s understanding of a steam engine could lead to crude trains being developed in the classical era provided access to necessary materials and engineers

permalink
report
parent
reply

provided access to necessary materials

That’s going to really limit the kind of places you could do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Inoculation is an easy one if I could get someone to believe it, as well as whatever basic medical knowledge I have on hand (cool it with the bloodletting maybe?). Might be able to make a simple battery if I thought hard enough.

Could do a crude musket if I could figure out gunpowder (can remember saltpeter and ash(?) off the top of my head). That opens up cannons too. Assuming I’ve traveled to before these were readily available, whoever I swear allegiance to could have access to briefly unmatched firepower until the technology was copied. Crossbow should be possible as well, and also doesn’t need as valuable of resources

Outside of the 20th and 21st century, I think most things should be replicable pretty far back, like into the classical age if you’re somewhere fairly “developed” like Rome. It’s hard to underestimate the importance of simply knowing that something is possible because it was done before.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

gotta have some metallurgy to make gunpowder give you muskets though I think

permalink
report
parent
reply

probably the biggest impact i might be able to pull off would be some kind of irrigation improvement. like wind powered and/or muscle assisted (treadle-style maybe) pumping and storing at some moderate increase in elevation (~4 feet above crops) to a clay sealed pond. something i could pull off at a small scale as a proof of concept and communicate to others through demonstration for a larger scale project. besides slavery and shoulder buckets, flood and furrow was The Show for a long time, but it uses so much goddam water and salinity buildup collapsed whole civilizations. to be able to go deeper, have better flood protection, and build up an elevated reserve that could be more tightly controlled without a ton of labor time would probably be a major game changer in freeing up effort and protecting water resources, not to mention letting people farm reliably further away from rivers that are contested resources.

also, probably something related to plowing. like basically getting people to not do it when it isn’t necessary, to protect top soil instead of just hammer it until it’s gone and dampen the “need” to expand into new lands, find new sources of fertility, etc. probably a lighter footprint plow/more of a cultivator, nitrogen fixing rotations, cover crops and conservation strips to prevent erosion. that might be harder to convince, because the science has been definitive for decades and people still go hard on tillage and absolutely kick the shit out of soils because they think it is cool and makes fields look “tidy”.

the easiest thing that would probably change history would be to go back to pre-antiquity and bring knowledge of the location and size of massive, easily accessible salt deposits and how to navigate there by the stars.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Trauma medicine and modern agriculture, the basics of modern scientific philosophy and dialectical materialism, I could probably draw a mostly-accurate map and chart a few of the notable dangerous currents, the dynamics of climate change/public health to get them away from fossil fuels.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I dont think industrial revolution is possible without fossil fuels

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fossil Capital writes a lot about this and it’s definitely false. We moved away from water powered factories to coal powered factories not because of the energy (coal was actually more expensive) but because having to build factories in the rural countryside on rivers meant workers had too much power to strike and couldn’t be replaced. Moving the factories to cities meant the reserve army of labor was much bigger and you could break strikes, but you needed coal rather than water wheels.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Got any literature sounds interesting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Haha, so all those people saying that a collapse of civilization would leave us technologically crippled forevermore is just wishful thinking on their part?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Water is a possible alternative in the case of factories and electricity generation but not in the case of metal smelting

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

dynamics of climate change/public health to get them away from fossil fuels

i respect it but how i woukdnt know how to begin on explaining that to a peasant

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

i think at its simplest you’d essentially be saying “see this black rock? when it burns it makes you sick. you know how it warms your homes/makes heat in your forges/whatever? it also heats the planet, do this enough and it will be too hot to live”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

i dont think thatd be exactly intuitive to people who have to burn stuff to survive. what about some kind of cult of ecology that can counterbalance industry & burning things?

✍️ every tonne of coal burned must have 180000 trees planted ✍️ in the first testament

permalink
report
parent
reply

History

!history@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember…we’re all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don’t pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

Community stats

  • 26

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 152K

    Comments