Permanently Deleted
MySpace was too much about the individual. I was in High School when it was the main thing, so that age colors my view of it, but it was super customizable, somewhere between Tumblr and Geocities, but to the point where a lot of pages were unusable. I had friends who prided themselves on making their profiles as unreadable as possible. And the auto play music was awful, even the stuff I normally liked.
Early Facebook wasn’t bad. I was on there before 2010, and I liked how kind of austere it felt after the chaos of MySpace.
And the auto play music was awful, even the stuff I normally liked.
Okay, first of all, how dare you. And second, you are out of my top 8. Please lose my icq name.
Social media companies are all just advertising companies - the second any one of them actually attempted to generate revenue they all regress to being glorified billboards.
I think all you’d really need to do to revert facbook back to that earlier, more interpersonal website is remove the share
button. No more effortless reposts. You wanna spread a link? Copy and paste that shit. You wanna show off a photo or a meme? Download it to your hard-drive, find it in the directory, and upload it. One little change, and suddenly facebook would be useable again.
I honestly struggle to see the value-add of any social media site like Facebook. It seems like their central function is to atomize and narcissize, I don’t see a way this sort of infrastructure can’t be fundamentally negative.
I get it I didn’t think you were defending Facebook. My point is the social aspect of these sites is part of what’s bad about it.
For the very small subsection of people who are housebound and simply cannot socialize otherwise, yeah this kind of medium is an unqualified good. But for basically everyone else they get captured having these social interactions mediated through a screen, serves to remove time from life actually socializing with real people. It’s that substitution that performs the atomization and narcissism.
I’m pretty convinced anything beyond a basic chat function like ICQ (which is now basically Signal/WhatsApp) is fundamentally negative, and the idea that aspects of it don’t feel negative is part of what’s negative about it.
Fundamentally FB is all self-aggrandizement, narcissistic status seeking and branding oneself.
Whereas Twitter is driven by hashtags, ostensibly the centrality being about news items and subject driven.
Farcebook is all about me. Filled with banal cloying pictures of people’s lunch, kids and vacations.
Twitter is about We. Much less about personal habits and more about how people feel in real time about a subject.
The latter a truly world conversation. The former like a jr high cafeteria.