15 points
*

5 ft/s is an incredibly slow run. My boy is fake sprinting away while actually going at a slow walking pace.

And 1ft/sec is practically an impossible speed to walk at, she’s like gone so insane she’s pigeon-stepping away.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Because its DiffEq, I’m assuming these were intended to be accelerations rather than velocities. So, he starts walking away and then picks up into a sprint. She starts at a crawl and advances to a steady walk.

But I bet the person writing the prompt (or the app translating the question) fumbled the notation for s^2, so now (hopefully) the entire class is going to fail this question and get it curved out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Agreed. But even then, who the hell walks away from a point with linear acceleration? That’s really hard to picture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean, its a math problem at its heart, not an engineering problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply

he’s running through the tears and tripping and snotting and it’s really pathetic

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

fucking calculus :homer-bye:

permalink
report
reply
5 points

You can solve this without a single differentiation or integration. This is barely algebra.

permalink
report
parent
reply

fucking math :homer-bye:

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Okay so by the Pythagorean theorem, a^2 + b^2 = c^2

If we take the boy’s position at time t as a, then a = 5t, and the girl’s position b = t

Thus their distance at a given time is sqrt((5t)^2 + t^2) = sqrt(26t^2) =sqrt(26)t

Taking the derivative of that in terms of t gives us sqrt(26) feet

I think, it’s been like 10 years since I last studied calculus

permalink
report
reply

yeah ur right. but the rate of change of the distance between them is always sqrt(26) ft/s. the problem is flawed since it doenst actually require calculus to solve, just plug in t=1 and you get sqrt(26)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

the problem is flawed

I hate questions that have this confusing language element (rate of separating… after 5 seconds) when it isn’t even clear if the person writing the question knew what they were asking. You’re left second-guessing the test-prompt, because now you’re double checking to see if the original 5 ft/s, 1 ft/s were actually accelerations rather than velocities. You’re worried that the answer is too easy, because it doesn’t involve the math you were prompted to study prior to the exam. You’re wasting time on parsing the language rather than doing the math.

Its just an awful way to conduct an exam, because its rewarding confidence rather than competence.

permalink
report
parent
reply

yeah western academia is a joke :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I mean, precisely. It’s Pythagoras and linear algebra, this is not calculus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I did take a derivative though

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Huh? You took the derivative by taking ‘t’ off the end, that ain’t calculus.

permalink
report
parent
reply

As a math guy, the answer is that he’s not going to move on for a while, while she already has.

permalink
report
reply

A: a million miles, too many to ever return

permalink
report
reply

memes

!memes@hexbear.net

Create post

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it’s a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we’ll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Community stats

  • 26

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 143K

    Comments