clicking noise

33 points

“Members of the party were average people who didn’t take part in the genocide”

They knew what the fuck they were signing up for. They’re not stupid. I hate the narrative that those who follow conservative/fascist mindsets are sheep, because that isn’t true. If you follow nazism, you are a nazi. That is it. If you follow an ideology which does an action at the expense of oppressed groups, that isn’t “being average”. That’s just taking advantage of privilege. I can’t believe people would dumb down nazis and conservatives as sheep.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

They’re just wholesome Nazis like my dear ole mommy

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I’m no Nazi apologist…

BUT-

permalink
report
reply
20 points

<Nazi apologia>

Fuck all Nazis. See a Nazi, punch a Nazi. All that jazz.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think “all that jazz” is my least favourite lib-ism. It’s the most token, empty way they can try and pretend to agree with you, the laziest thing they say to pretend they’re your friend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

You can’t call someone a Nazi unless they come from the Nazi region of Germany. Anyone else is just a sparkling fascist.

permalink
report
reply

I actually had a friend tell me this once, in 2017 after Charlottesville. When I called those guys Nazis, he said, “You’re minimizing what the Jewish people went through during the Holocaust. If they’re not a member of the NSDAP, they’re not Nazis.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

The premise of not wanting to use Holocaust related words lightly is a good idea because of things like double genocide theory.

However, when someone has explicit genocidal intent, denying it is literally enabling a genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

We need the link to go shit on this guy

permalink
report
reply
15 points
16 points

Aaaand they banned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The most perturbing question for the liberal is the question of violence. The liberal’s initial reaction to violence is to try to convince the oppressed that violence is an incorrect tactic, that violence will not work, that violence never accomplishes anything. The Europeans took America through violence and through violence they established the most powerful country in the world. Through violence they maintain the most powerful country in the world. It is absolutely absurd for one to say that violence never accomplishes anything.

Most societies in the West are not opposed to violence. The oppressor is only opposed to violence when the oppressed talks about using violence against the oppressor. Then the question of violence is raised as the incorrect means to attain one’s ends.

https://redsails.org/the-pitfalls-of-liberalism/

These sort of people act like the organized violence inflicted by the oppressor was just siblings having a shouting match and having to learn to share space. No sense of the gravity of what they’re talking about.

permalink
report
reply

Shit Reactionaries Say

!shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

Under new rules (Jan 2023), only this “Shit X Say” community is allowed along with Shit Ultras Say.

This community is for anything a reactionary would say that is shit. You know the drill. This includes:

  • Liberals
  • Fascists
  • Conservatives
  • Monarchists
  • Vaushites

etc etc.

Please do include the type of reactionary between brackets [] in your post title if you can.

All posts are marked NSFW (community is NSFW) because most people don’t want to see this on their lemmygrad timeline.

Community stats

  • 63

    Monthly active users

  • 2.2K

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments