Multipolarity is inevitable.

59 points

I don’t really like portraying Russia as the noble knight here, even if their actions work in our favor.

permalink
report
reply

It kinda works if you understand knights as existing to defend oppressing class of feudalism.

But yeah, we don’t need to stan modern russia to oppose western imperialism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Maybe before the end of the century they’ll turn into one of those renagade knights (Florian Geyer, Goetz von Berlinchingen) who fought on the side of the peasants? A comrade can dream.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I put this kind of thing in the same category as Soviet wartime art that depicts the Anglos and Americans positively.

Like yeah, they’re not good, but they’re on our side and we’d rather have them than not have them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

While China has a party moving towards socialism and is showing foresight by doing a lot for climate change and doing arguably-charitable development of African & Asian nations, does Russia do anything cool or good? Seems like they sell fossil fuels, promote intolerant beliefs, and happen to be opposed to the West

permalink
report
reply
62 points

… and happen to be opposed to the West

Just that really. The ruzzian regime must be promptly overthrown once it outlives its usefulness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Indeed. Russia will most likely be the next big “enemy of socialism” in the world after the western bloc collapses. The difference is that they’ll be much, much weaker than the whole western bloc and will struggle to prevent socialist uprisings in other countries (and hopefully, even in their own).

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Okay, struggle session/tough comradely love time: we don’t write “RuZZian” here unironically. It’s a lib slur which – if you look at the way it’s typically used – is directed as much against the Russian people as their government. Don’t stoop to the libs’ level. (Erich Mielke moment ended).

But on a less antagonistic note : I honestly can see things in Russia going a couple ways as the result of this conflict. One is what you and @DamarcusArt have outlined, which is Russia becoming the next major anti-socialist power. This presupposes a relatively quick collapse of the western bloc. The other is that the world again coalesces into two relatively stable power blocs, and Russia moves in the direction of socialism, in fact if not in name. They will have to do this if they are to remain sovereign in the face of long-term western agression, because fighting imperialism on the basis of the national bourgeoisie is something never works in the long run. Venezuela tried it, and found they had to adopt socialism. The KPRF is to be criticized in many ways, but they still are a large party with many supporters.

There is a third possibility, and I really hope for the sake of the world and the Russian people it doesn’t happen: Russia keeps fighting the west, but also remains capitalist. The result will be collapse, balkanization, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I use liberal slurs because I am a liberal. This is something I need to work on, because my first and only instinct when seeing an obstacle is to dehumanize it so that I can destroy it more easily. Frankly, I’m nervous to even participate in a party because I can only see myself being a wrecker, intentionally or otherwise.

I don’t have anything constructive to say to the rest of your comment besides I hope the third option doesn’t come to pass.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

They do a lot to support global south countries like Nicaragua and Venezuela. Without Russia, these countries would be struggling even more than they already are. Might’ve even been couped by the US again.

They’re not communist by any means, but these days countries are united by their shared grievances against the West rather than ideological agreement. And really, that’s the biggest hurdle preventing the development of socialism (western meddling I mean)

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Happen to be opposed to the West is a massive oversimplification

They’ve shared lots of military knowledge and intelligence with China, DPRK, and Iran

They’re close and strong allies with China

They’ve indirectly fought against the West and defended countries from imperialism in proxy wars in Syria, Ukraine, and all over Africa

They’ve also proven that they can withstand the biggest sanctions the West can throw and still thrive, providing nations a reliable partner that isn’t aligned with the West

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Opposing what had historically been the only superpower and the current world hegemony is enough really. That is a real big ask. Cause presumably all they would have to do is sell out to the west and they could have all the money they wanted you know?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Cause presumably all they would have to do is sell out to the west and they could have all the money they wanted you know?

You would think that, but 1991 and the following years tells a different story. The West is not willing to consider Russia friendly under any circumstances.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

That is was to break the spirit of comunism. Now that the revolution there is broken I doubt that ideological controlls are tight enough here to keep the markets from going in if Russia allowed it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

They’re doing great work fighting NATO right now, and taking out the anti-semitic trash from europe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Russia provides security to African countries in a way China is unable or unwilling to. Wagner is in Niger helping deter a French puppet invasion. Before that they were also in Mali and CAR doing similar things.

No doubt they’re doing it out of self interest and not charity, but I’m sure those African countries would rather have the military assistance than not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I think we all overestimate Russia’s power, now and in the last 70 years.

My thinking is that they spend a lot of energy on defending, there isn’t much left for progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Not really a fan of this sort of stuff. Dehumanising your enemies and treating them as monsters never ends well.

permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

Inaccurate. The US head should clearly be in charge, larger, more important, more powerful and imposing than its vassal states France, Germany, Britain, Japan (and the other two, Israel and?). As it is, it’s a vampire on them, they are not equal.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Love it

permalink
report
reply

GenZedong

!genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

  • No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
  • We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
  • If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
  • Unless it’s an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
  • For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
  • Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

Community stats

  • 79

    Monthly active users

  • 3.6K

    Posts

  • 31K

    Comments