11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
19 points

Shows two voted against, but I only see one country in red, what is the second one?

permalink
report
reply

Like the place in the bible? Why would that have a UN vote?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

What country? I don’t believe that exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Isn’treal

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

If you zoom in you can barely see Israel being red… altho the compression on this is so bad, it’s hard to tell whether that are just compression artifacts or not

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That’s weird, that country looks like Palestine to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Palestine would vote yes, this is Occupied Palestine

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The map doesn’t show it, but I think it was Israel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

The last emoji in the title doesn’t show up on my end

Edit: fixed typos

permalink
report
reply

Here’s the US lying through its teeth about why it voted no:

https://geneva.usmission.gov/2017/03/24/u-s-explanation-of-vote-on-the-right-to-food/

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Wasn’t it basically trying to push IP rights and extra judicial arbiters on the other nations?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah, that was part of it

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Smh so disappointing they’re like “well we have agricultural safety concerns and we aren’t sure that the policy would work as intended…so let them starve instead nothing we can do so sad”

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Mask slipping moment there. I think their real motivation is more like this:

“We would lose global influence if food were a human right, as we heavily subsidise our food industry so we can export it for cheap, destroying local food production in other countries and forcing them to be reliant on our “humanitarian” aid.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh no doubt, but they can’t go out and say that, I just mean their “official” statement is extremely disappointing because they’d only release a statement on a UN vote like that if they know it’s fucked up. Obviously they give the most professional sounding excuse but that “professional” excuse of theirs is especially disrespectful given the fact that we all know they’re lying on top of being just legitimately evil

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

wait Taiwan is a UN member state?

permalink
report
reply

Taiwan has a limited status in some international organizations under the name “Chinese Taipei” (this name greatly angers Taiwanese ultranationalists so I use it whenever possible), but the UN recognizes it as part of China.

There’s a video of the UN voting on the PRC’s membership to the exclusion of Taiwan, the entire room laughs when America casts its vote and there’s an interview somewhere with a RoC diplomat whining about their “true democracy and freedom” despite the RoC being a one-party white terror regime.

permalink
report
parent
reply

this name greatly angers Taiwanese ultranationalists so I use it whenever possible

permalink
report
parent
reply

There’s a video of the UN voting on the PRC’s membership to the exclusion of Taiwan, the entire room laughs when America casts its vote

unmultimedia.org; “1976th Plenary Meeting of General Assembly: 26th Session - Part 2” (skip to ~6:50)

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

The UN recognized the PRC as the only China in 1971. Before that they recognized the RoC as the only China.

Each gov’t has a policy of not recognizing any state that recognizes the other gov’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Late Stage Capitalism

!latestagecapitalism@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 469

    Posts

  • 1.9K

    Comments