I don’t like being referred to as a “person with autism”. I can’t just set it down, it’s not something I can remove. It is fundamental to the way I interact with the world, right down to how stim enters my brain. If my brain has types of inputs no allistic person can even approach, and methods of processing inherently different, it is an existence no allistic person can reach. There is no version of me that is not autistic.

A “cure” is the same as shooting me and replacing me with someone else.

The type of person I am is autistic. I am autistic.

I know it is a big trend in leftist spaces to use person first language, but in many situations that just sounds like eugenics to me. Personhood is not some distinct universal experience. There is no “ideal human mind” floating out there in the aether for them to recognize in me.

I get that person first language helps some people recognize that thoughts happen behind my eyes, but if the only way they can do that is by imagining I’m them, I don’t care.

I’m perfectly fine with “person with autism” and “autistic” but if you call me an “autist” I will punch you in the throat

permalink
report
reply
21 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Same. Applies to everything …religion, sex and gender, etc. I tend to think if you treat people with respect and apologise if you fuck up (And learn from the fuck up.), youll be fine. Of course there are people that wont allow you to move on, and thats up to them, you arent gonna get on with everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I can’t directly relate. I strongly prefer ‘person with schizophrenia’ to ‘schizophrenic’ (or similar, worse terms). I feel that, first and foremost, I am a person, as are all people, neurodivergent or not.

But also, I support you in being referred to as you want. I don’t need to relate to your experience to just, refer to you as an autist (when I would need to refer to it at all), after you tell me you prefer that.

permalink
report
reply
27 points
*

Yeah I really don’t agree with this thread and i don’t like the language discourse prescribing to others how I should be referred to. OP prefers “autist,” I prefer the exact opposite. I can’t relate to wanting my identity to be defined by autism rather than be referred to as a person who experiences it.

Can’t wait to be called an asshole in the future because i disagree with others telling me how to speak, especially in reference to something that affects me directly

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I’ve heard repeatedly, from different autists, how they explained this to teachers for pschology, pedagogy etc. and the teachers listened, nodded along and then immediately went on to keep using person first language.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

That’s a silly thing for a person with teaching to do, ngl.

permalink
report
parent
reply

yeah I’ve had similar experiences as well, it has lead to me having little trust in teachers in general

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

It’s a general problem with academics and marginalized people, the academic world just moves slower than the communities they’re dealing with and they’re always lagging 10 years behind in their language and can’t spontaneously course-correct because direct input from the people they’re talking about counts less to them than what’s on the books. Really shows you the priorities.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t think slower is the right way to put it, they often end up on the front lines of building oppressive structures themselves

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Ask them if they’d call a black person a “person with blackness”

permalink
report
reply

Is that not what “person of color” is trying to do?

permalink
report
parent
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Not really, it’s a more accurate and meaningful term to replace “minority”, especially since white minorities in non-white regions can still have white privilege

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I prefer non-White because that’s what the category is really about, defining people in opposition to the political racial ideology of Whiteness

permalink
report
parent
reply

I have seen people in the comments on some platforms argue for that when I mention stuff like this, its a time

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I think “black person” is more or less equivalent to “autistic person/person with autism”.

CW racist language

What OP is asking would be closer to calling someone “a black”, which sounds offensive for obvious reasons - it reduces personhood and emphasizes their difference, one that historically was used to discriminate

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Only because in that case the word was used to persecute. Same how both “A latino(a)” and “a latino person” are fine, but “a hispanic” is really bad

permalink
report
parent
reply

specifically “a hispanic” is bad because it’s wrong linguistically? Was it used historically (or now) to be racist? I looked up historical use real quick and only found stuff about adding “Hispanic” as a choice in the 70s. What did i miss?

permalink
report
parent
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Only because “blackness” isn’t really a typical (or technically appropriate) word? I’ve heard “people with darker skin” or equivalent and it seems to have been fine, in appropriate contexts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

People with darker skin sounds weird as fuck and is kinda meaningless phrase

“Dark skinned people” is better

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

As a cracker, I’m in no position to assert what is or isn’t better. But as I say, I’ve heard the phrase/equivalent used many times by many a person and it’s been fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I am a person with autism the way I am a person with legs, they’re kind of an important part of me

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yup. Cause i thought that was the “right” term.

permalink
report
parent
reply

neurodiverse

!neurodiverse@hexbear.net

Create post

What is Neurodivergence?

It’s ADHD, Autism, OCD, schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, bi-polar, aspd, etc etc etc etc

“neurologically atypical patterns of thought or behavior”

So, it’s very broad, if you feel like it describes you then it does as far as we’re concerned


Rules

1.) ableist language=post or comment will probably get removed (enforced case by case, some comments will be removed and restored due to complex situations). repeated use of ableist language=banned from comm and possibly site depending on severity. properly tagged posts with CW can use them for the purposes of discussing them

2.) always assume good faith when dealing with a fellow nd comrade especially due to lack of social awareness being a common symptom of neurodivergence

2.5) right to disengage is rigidly enforced. violations will get you purged from the comm. see rule 3 for explanation on appeals

3.) no talking over nd comrades about things you haven’t personally experienced as a neurotypical chapo, you will be purged. If you’re ND it is absolutely fine to give your own perspective if it conflicts with another’s, but do so with empathy and the intention to learn about each other, not prove who’s experience is valid. Appeal process is like appealing in user union but you dm the nd comrade you talked over with your appeal (so make it a good one) and then dm the mods with screenshot proof that you resolved it. fake screenies will get you banned from the site, we will confirm with the comrade you dm’d.

3.5) everyone has their own lived experiences, and to invalidate them is to post cringe. comments will be removed on a case by case basis depending on determined level of awareness and faith

4.) Interest Policing will not be tolerated in any form. Support your comrades in their joy!

Further rules to be added/ rules to be changed based on community input

RULES NOTE: For this community more than most we understand that the clarity and understandability of these rules is very important for allowing folks to feel comfortable, to that end please don’t be afraid to be outspoken about amendments and addendums to these rules, as well as any we may have missed

Community stats

  • 52

    Monthly active users

  • 638

    Posts

  • 8.4K

    Comments