I noticed that lemmy.world and slrpnk.net host old.lemmy.world and old.slrpnk.net and I was wondering if there was any interest in doing that here. Personally, I think it meshes with the SDF vibe.

Edit: this would be in addition to regular Lemmy

Edit 2: it looks like they added it at old.lemmy.sdf.org. Thank you @SDF@lemmy.sdf.org!

1 point

As someone that spends a lot of time on a vintage machine using sites like 68k.news and frogfind.com , I think it would be really sweet if there was a non JavaScript front end that could render correctly in something like Netscape 4. I know I’m a weirdo, but there’s a lot of weirdos like me on SDF :-)

permalink
report
reply
1 point

there’s a lot of weirdos like me on SDF

weirdo here, can confirm

permalink
report
parent
reply

Wow! I knew about 68k.news but not frogfind.com! That one is awesome. Works nicely on my Alcatel 1066G which I have as secondary phone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

The default Lemmy interface already combines everything good about old.reddit’s design with additional quality of life features, faster performance, and Fediverse-oriented functionality.

No, I do not want to use an old.reddit clone. Lemmy is already better and can be further improved by the community itself. We should be encouraging newcomers to embrace innovation, not encouraging them to go back to Reddit.

permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

I had meant in addition to the regular Lemmy UI as something cool for people to use if they want to… not force everyone to use it 🤣. When I tested lemmy.world vs old.lemmy.world just now, respectively, I got 14.31 seconds vs 6.98 seconds with 32 requests each and 1.5MB vs 4.8 MB transferred (all this was done un-cached in Chromium). So on my end, old is heavier, but also faster.

Regardless, I just think that the old front-end is cool and retro looking, and I was wondering if others here thought the same or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think having a noscript site like old.lemmy.sdf.org available could only be a net positive, I can’t imagine that it would hurt to have it as an option, as long as it’s not too much work to keep it running.

permalink
report
reply

sdfpubnix

!sdfpubnix@lemmy.sdf.org

Create post

Fans of SDF

Community stats

  • 3

    Monthly active users

  • 127

    Posts

  • 624

    Comments

Community moderators