36 points

Cool, crash the price of oil right be fore the election.

Biden is trying to make Harris lose. He hates her for taking his job.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Bibi for sure is. Biden’s barely functional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Bibi is definitely trying to make Harris lose, but I think Biden is still functional enough before 5pm to hold a grudge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Biden’s bitter at people realizing he’s too old. Pretty sure he was hoping to go out like feinstein.

Bibi just wants someone he can influence with shiney things rather than needing to pull strings.

What a fantastic democracy/republic we have in the USA 😭

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

stalin shouldn’t have stopped at berlin

permalink
report
reply
32 points
*

If anyone wants, here’s an extremely optimistic 2009 Brookings Institute white paper on how various hostile actions against Iran would play out based off numbers and history.

Chapter 3 analyses a “boots on the ground” invasion (the occupation would require a draft), Chapters 4-6 analyze American and Israeli airstrikes. Neither of them expect Iran to employ masses of drones or close the strait, and they consider ballistic missiles against US assets unlikely.

While they have an extreme western bias, there’s no way you can twist the numbers to look good.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

This is one psychotic document, jesus

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Chapter 3 analyses a “boots on the ground” invasion (the occupation would require a draft)

Good luck, I’m defecting as soon as they don’t have eyes on me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It makes it pretty clear how insanely unfeasible a ground invasion of Iran would be even with the most optimistic assumptions.

1.3 million just for the occupation of an 88 million pop country, and that number just comes from other occupations, without taking into consideration the terrain or people or last 50 years of preparation for asymmetrical warfare.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Why is still president?

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Because the term isn’t up yet and taking him down for being unable to perform his duties would be greatly damaging to US optics-based politics.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You’re right. But how is it not damaging to US optics-based politics to have a dementia addled old man start a war with Iran?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I don’t know, i never seen starting a war being damaging to US politics, it usually gets their numbers up.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Iran really should be preemptively striking Israel; I mean Israel is literally drawing up invasion plans.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

It’s called deescalation through escalation.

America supports it when Israel does it, that means it’s okay.

Iran, go right ahead. Lebanon, go right ahead. Hamas, go right ahead.

Israel and America have already stated this is a perfectly valid reasoning. The rules of war go both ways.

Again: If America is the world ethics, these actions are perfectly valid. This is what America does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

This is what America does.

Except it isn’t. USA does not preemptively attack countries which plan to attack USA, since nobody is doing that. USA wrecks and coups countries because they are either trying to leave the US hegemonic control or the ones that are simply appealing targets for imperialism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

First ever actual preemptive strike.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 37

    Monthly active users

  • 6.9K

    Posts

  • 27K

    Comments