Just sort by top of the month, all our top posts range from 1 week to 1 month old, with very few being from the past few days of record “online” numbers.
Anyone who knows how Reddit communities work in the same sense know that when community member numbers go up along with concurrent online users, the post vote counts go up proportionally.
It doesn’t seem to make sense that with nearly 1900 users online at once the top post of the day has 214 points while posts from many weeks ago were getting more.
Did we change how “online user” is determined or is there a glitch?
edit:
Tested what people were saying about how “online users” is really just “open tabs”
I imagine a few things are happening:
- “online users” algorithm changed
- more people online with no account
- enthusiasm for the site has dampened somewhat, so people aren’t just upvoting everything in the same way
but the most likely is simply:
- more users = more libs = worse posts :)
Yeah maybe an extension of how long ago a person had to have visited the site to count as “online”.
For Reddit I think it’s around 20–30 minutes, for here they may have extended it to hours or the day.
Do we know if this site even counts non-account visits as online users? That wouldn’t make sense to me.
It would be nice to have a public traffic page like Reddit has for their mods, I’d love to see the site growing over time. Would be encouraging.
Do you know if this is how “online users” has been calculated over the life of the site?
So when we had ~800 users online for weeks, it was really like 250 people?
Yeah I didn’t think so, only that something fucky was going on with the system.
No site with nearly 2000 people online should be so slow with posts.
Having a full transparency post about the traffic we get would be appreciated, and make it a lot better to track how outreach on Reddit effects activity and traffic here.
No I think it was accurate up until last week, when the code was changed. To quote Awoo
It’s clearly just a change in the backend caused by ongoing development that occurred on the 7th.
The code was this way since before we even started chapo.chat, so not really no. Lemmy counts websockets and the front-end opens one websocket per tab as it comes, and I even think someone noticed this on the first time we fired up the dev server.
Hmm I’ve got an idea how it could be fixed, been a while since I’ve touched the code but I could attack it this weekend when I’m done with my math exams lol
Comments are going up drastically. People are probably visiting fewer posts than before because their session is spent in comment sections longer than visibly looking at and voting on posts.
If you think of a person’s session as having an average length, let’s say 1 hour to be convenient. If someone was spending 30 minutes viewing posts and 30 minutes in comment sections previously but is now spending 20 minutes viewing posts but 40 minutes viewing comment sections – the result you will get is fewer votes on posts and significantly more comments.
Here’s the comment data per day.
The total posts are trending upwards too, but not as strongly as the comments. My guess is people are considerably enjoying the comment sections here and getting sucked into them more than over on reddit. User behaviour is still adapting and changing to adapt to seeing ChapoChat as its own separate thing to reddit so there are currently changing habits in the userbase. It will probably take a long time to settle especially with an actively changing site due to the fast dev work.
I’m speculating of course but if you keep everyone’s session length the same and change how much of that session is spent within each area of the site you would end up changing comment totals, post total and vote totals in a variety of ways and since post totals aren’t going up as quickly as comments this is what I think. People just love how friendly and pleasant ChapoChat is compared to reddit, getting a message notification is a pleasing thing instead of something the users dread like on reddit.
All of this might be true, but the weird inflated number of online users comes because we’re counting every tab as someone online, as established elsewhere in this thread.
Oh yeah absolutely. I had noted it and noticed that the jump in online users had not also corresponded with a jump in comments or posts. It’s clearly just a change in the backend caused by ongoing development that occurred on the 7th.
Things look very healthy besides that bug though. Everything continues to trend upwards nicely at a steady and comfortable pace. New user gain is accelerating slowly too. Ignore everything before the spike, data in that period was clearly warped by mass account creation for the purpose of wrecking and you can clearly see the exact date wrecker nonsense ceased. Average new users per day is trending upwards at a steady pace. The site will double in size in a year if no change in user gain occurs but I would bet on a larger gain in size due to acceleration. The more users we have, the faster we will grow. Probably 3 times the size we are now or more in 12 months time. By 24 months the site could be back at subreddit numbers. By 36 months who knows what.
i agree, it sure feels like the online user count isn’t right.
You’re right that the user count is inflated via tabs but we have more upvotes on comments and posts in the last 2 weeks than we did the previous 2 weeks from that. Posts: 250k vs 219k Comments: 755k vs 645k
14 days into Oct compared to 14 days into Sept Posts: 256k vs 155k Comments: 760k vs 423k
Similarly for pure post/comment count: Comments: 72k vs 42k Posts: 6.2k vs 5.2k
