Parts of it are good, but the social dynamics, politics, and obsessions among certain power-users make some parts of it really bad.
Its ok so long as its not anything political or to do with big corporations.
You should watch this if you have time: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDPrpKDjQ5U
If you’re bourgeois and want to defend imperialism.
It has a bad habit of using non-peer-reviewed sources where they should not be appropriate and giving those sources the last word. A lot of articles end with “This dude says in [non-peer-reviewed book] that [false thing]”.
in theory yes, in practice no.
power users and bad sources being upheld are a major issue, as stated in other comments, and those issues are baked into how wikipedia is built