14 points

Poor dude really seems to be confused by the hostility he’s been received with. Rationalists aren’t anywhere near as interested in being right as feeling right. He won’t make much progress that way

One might say

he should update his priors

permalink
report
reply
11 points

At the risk of being NSFW.

When I met Yud some years ago, I asked him how he goes about learning new things, his answer was roughly: “Scroll on Facebook until I find someone who has written about it.” Maybe he actually read some of the sources he references a long time ago but I think he gave up on learning new things and has sat comfortably abusing his power over the community.

Egads these people are gross.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

ah, this is the same storied research mechanism my mom used to get into David Icke and telephone psychics

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Good lord I can’t imagine learning about things on Facebook.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

There’s something infuriating about this. Making basic errors that show you don’t have the faintest grasp on what people are arguing about, and then acting like the people who take the time to get Ph.Ds and don’t end up agreeing with your half-baked arguments are just too stupid to be worth listening to is outrageous.

Hey, that’s what we’ve been saying for years!

permalink
report
reply
7 points

All right, pack it up boys, guess we don’t need the ol’ sneer club no more.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

oh they run one of these “wait … this sucks” posts every year or so. don’t worry, they never have the slightest effect. and notice how the guy still thinks scott is a good poster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

He said he’s fed up with Yudkowsky, not fed up with Moldbug.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

he still thinks Scott is awesome for instance

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I don’t know whether I should feel happy that I will have a sustainable snark receptacle for the near future or sad that the basilisk won’t eventually consume itself tail-first.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

with all this saltiness about it, the basilisk might be inedible at this point. or at least an acquired taste.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The Coco Chanel meme is quite funny, given that the writer seems too young to know much about her other than that she’s some sort of fashion lady. (There’s a Behind the Bastards series on her upbringing, business attitude, and collaboration with Nazis.)

Not only do I not understand how the Landauer limit works, I don’t even know what it is.

Points for honesty, I guess? But also demerits for not at least reading the Wikipedia article. Rationalists are so quick to write paragraphs explaining that they didn’t read paragraphs.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Re: Coco Chanel, it’s an uncomfortable fact that huge swaths of French society (particularly the more conservative parts) were quite OK with German involvement in French governance, at least until the forced labor requirements sending people to work in Germany. The Third Republic was hardly a model social democracy and if the Nazis hadn’t been such incompetent overlords we might have seen a coal and steel union decades before it happened, with Vichy France being an integral part of a Nazi-led European union.

Instead the Nazis looted most of France and made it quite clear that the French were going to be second-class citizens forever, and once they started looking less unbeatable everyone was part of the Resistance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

look at the British aristocracy, who are still full of fucking Nazis

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

For sure, there were many who would have prepared to cut a deal with Hitler - let him have Europe (and to hell with the strategy of not letting any major power dominate there) in return for the inviolability of the empire.

permalink
report
parent
reply

SneerClub

!sneerclub@awful.systems

Create post

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

Posts or links discussing our very good friends should have “NSFW” ticked (Nice Sneers For Winners).

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from our very good friends.

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

[Especially don’t debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 74

    Posts

  • 563

    Comments