32 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
25 points
*

Unironically, really. Piracy is the sole reason the games industry is even minorly reasonable and so widely accessible. Studies suggest it causatively increases sales. If it wasn’t for piracy, I’m convinced I would’ve been completely priced out the market and just never got into games on any meaningful level.

Why should that philosophy not be extended to all things?

permalink
report
reply

Yeah, the piracy case really drives this home. Piracy of media (especially movies, music, and TV shows) absolutely plummeted during the golden age of streaming: it turns out that most people are willing to pay a little bit to access media on demand as long as that access is consistent, convenient, and relatively cheap. As soon as streaming started hard down the road to enshittification by jacking up prices and fragmenting into a million different services, piracy started to heat back up again. You’d think media companies would learn a lesson here, but apparently not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

primewire dot mx

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

someone stole your personal property? that’s bad

someone stole your private property you were using to extract rents and surplus value? oh no, you might have to sell your labor

permalink
report
reply
18 points

In a capitalist world, a thief is probably the most hardworking person and a risk taking entrepreneur/disruptor

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Provided you’re stealing from the rich. If you’re stealing from some poor prole you’re not much better than a capitalist.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Braver then the troops 🫡

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Hilariously, there is an extensive body of microeconomics work on just this topic.

permalink
report
reply