L’Internationale :france-cool:

The Paris Commune was established on 18 March 1871, but its roots can be traced right back to 1848, when a wave of democratic revolution originating in France washed across the European continent

In France, the democratic revolution was defeated in a matter of months, ending with the bloody suppression of a workers’ revolt protesting against the closure of the national workshops in June 1848. Despite this, the street fighting of this period laid the foundations for the establishment of an autonomous French workers’ movement, which operated independently of the centrist bourgeois political parties—a key prerequisite for the formation of the 72-day-long “Republic of Workers” in 1871.

Following the defeat of the uprising, however, a military dictatorship initially asserted control, before handing the reins to Napoleon III a few months later. East of the Rhine, in a fragmented Germany, monarchic powers were also able to put down revolutionary efforts and defeat the democracy movement. The latter’s demand for German national unity was subsequently co-opted “from above”, redefined and positioned as a project designed to suit the Prussian-led response. The policies pursued by the Prussian crown were geared towards preserving monarchic power while also seeking to unify Germany, this would led to the Franco-Prussian War.

During the Franco-Prussian war the then Emperor Napoleon III was capture during the Battle of Sedan. This sudden defeat sealed the fate of the Second French Empire, but did not signify the end of the war, with the Prussian troops marching onwards towards Paris with the aim of capturing it.

Following the defeat at the Battle of Sedan, the Third Republic was proclaimed in Paris, despite a complete lack of democratic legitimacy. Although the empire’s political and military failures meant it had been discredited, the Republic did not act to remove the monarchy. According to Marx, the measures taken by the government were evidence that they had “inherited from the empire not only ruins, but also its dread of the working class”.

By the beginning of October 1870, Paris was under total siege, beset on all sides by Prussian forces, and attempts to break the siege line with troops from the provinces had also failed. At the end of January 1871, Jules Favre, minister of foreign affairs for the Provisional Government of National Defence, signed an armistice with the newly formed German Empire

The armistice treaty stipulated that only a freshly elected National Assembly would have the power to ratify an eventual peace treaty. The assembly first met on 12 February in Bordeaux—far removed from the nation’s capital, which remained in a state of total siege by German troops.

In Paris, both the choice of location for the National Assembly as well as the make-up of the new government were viewed as betrayals of those who had spent months defending the capital against the siege.

In order to defend Paris against the German troops, in September 1870 the Thiers-led government had reorganized the National Guard and enlisted unemployed men into its regiments. This led to a change in the military’s demographic character; National Guard soldiers deposed their officers, elected new commanders from within their own ranks, and also established their own governing body, the Central Committee of the National Guard.

Having failed to capture the cannons and surprised by the workers’ resolve, Thiers decided to decamp the capital and head to Versailles, accompanied by his government and loyalist army regiments. That they were able to flee the city with ease was due to the fact that the National Guard battalions—anticipating a renewed attack by government forces—had barricaded themselves in their neighbourhood strongholds or otherwise directed their movements to avoid a confrontation.

As the sun set over Paris that evening, power in the French capital essentially resided on the streets. Given this situation, the National Guard’s Central Committee decided to cobble together a provisional government. The majority of the Parisian population first learnt of the shift that had occurred in their city the following morning, when the Central Committee occupied the Hôtel de Ville, raised a red flag, and addressed the city’s residents with their first proclamation:

You charged us with organizing the defence of Paris and of your rights.

We are conscious of having fulfilled this mission: aided by your generous courage and your admirable calm, we have chased out the government that betrayed us.

At this time our mandate has expired, and we yield it, for we don’t claim to be taking the place of those who a revolutionary wind has just overthrown.

So prepare and carry out your communal elections, and as a reward give us the only one we ever wished for: seeing you establish the true republic.

In the meanwhile, in the name of the people we will remain at the Hôtel-de-Ville.

The provisional government’s first official act was publishing a call for elections to determine the make-up of the Commune Council. The revolution of the previous day had laid the foundations for a French republic that would permanently “mark the end of the era of invasions and civil war”. Additionally, the Central Committee saw itself as the force that had defended Paris and one which would now return control of the city to its residents through the council elections.

The election took place less than ten days later, on 26 March; just two days later, the Paris Commune officially came into being. Given the urgency of organizing an election within such a short timeframe, there was scant discussion about the Commune’s actual political programme in those first few days. For this reason—according to Prosper Lissagaray, himself a Communard—votes were primarily cast based on name recognition. Consequently, the Commune Council ended up comprising a colourful mixture of Jacobins, socialists, anarchists, Romantics, and representatives of the bourgeoise opposition to Napoleon III. This meant that the Commune included powerful factions that took their political inspiration from the concepts of the bourgeoise French Revolution of 1789 right alongside proto-socialists, anarchists, and Marxists. This diversity of political positions was reflective of the century of class struggle that had preceded the founding of the Commune.


Hola Camaradas :fidel-salute-big: , Our Comrades In Texas are currently passing Through some Hard times :amerikkka: so if you had some Leftover Change or are a bourgeoisie Class Traitor here are some Mutual Aid programs that you could donate to :left-unity-3:

The State and Revolution :flag-su:

:lenin-shining: :unity: :kropotkin-shining:

The Conquest of Bread :ancom:

Remember, sort by new you :LIB:

Yesterday’s megathread :sad-boi:

Follow the Hexbear twitter account :comrade-birdie:

THEORY; it’s good for what ails you (all kinds of tendencies inside!) :RIchard-D-Wolff:

COMMUNITY CALENDAR - AN EXPERIMENT IN PROMOTING USER ORGANIZING EFFORTS :af:

Join the fresh and beautiful batch of new comms:

!genzedong@hexbear.net :deng-salute:

!strugglesession@hexbear.net :why-post-this:

!libre@hexbear.net :anarxi:

!neurodiverse@hexbear.net :Care-Comrade:

Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
37 points
*

Ok I just saw this https://hexbear.net/post/94436 WHAT THE FUCK, how in the fucking hell are you gonna call yourself leftist if you think mocking other cultures as degenerate is ok. “Some cultures are cannibals too” wow that doesn’t sound like an argument from a chud at all /s

If you think that eating meat is universally wrong, that’s fine (and something I personally agree with) but there are fucking respectful ways to approach it that don’t involve you going around attacking people’s cultural heritages. There’s a really stark difference between criticizing tradition, and being an asshole racist about it and that feels like it way crosses the line of disrespectful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Veganism vs Indigenous people might be one of the worst struggle sessions we’ve had in a while. Like come on, you don’t have to be a dick to people’s cultures and histories just because you’re vegan, and vice versa, there’s a lot of indigenous people who are vegan. Like jeez, it doesn’t have to be this way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

There is no vice versa. Otherwise I agree

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Could’ve been entirely avoided if we change the default landing page to subscribed comms only

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Don’t even bother. My farewell post was stealth banned/hidden. This site is absolutely unsafe. https://hexbear.net/post/94432

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I see, my mistake. I’ve reposted to another comm for visibility and I request that you allow it to remain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

only through the direct link

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

There’s literally one in this comment thread, scroll up

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not enslaving and factory farming animals is racist actually

permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I understand it completely. It’s way easier to just dismiss something and call it racist than it is to actually think critically about your behavior.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

Looks at vegan comm :side-eye-1:

Time to add another victim of unsubscribism

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I’ve unsubscribed and it still shows up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah is there a way to just not see or block a particular comm? I’ve never been subscribed to vegan but half the posts i’ve seen in the last 5 days have been related to this issue and it’s pretty clear that a substantial part of a certain faction of it are wrecking

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you have it set in your settings that “subscribed” is the default?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Hmm, if on top subscribed button is selected, it works? Double check your options maybe, I’ve to set it twice I think

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

that was it, the subsribed button wasn’t selected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Main only

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Shoutout to @thelastaxolotl for being one of the few remaining posters to actually talk about communism. The megathread history blocks continue to be radical to the max.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

:stalin-heart:

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Makes me sad that the history com isn’t more active. The megathreads are a nice though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
35 points
*

Hey mods. Fuck yall! Is racism traumatizing? Or is that only for having to see a hamburger. More people are getting banned for disagreeing with the meat nsfw decision than all the racists you’re allowing to run all over the site. Get it the fuck together. I honestly don’t care if you want people to use the nsfw tag for meat, but who you are banning and for what speaks volumes.

permalink
report
reply

europe

!europe@hexbear.net

Create post

Includes Turkey, the UK, and Georgia.

Community stats

  • 3

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments