7 points

No, and partially yes

permalink
report
reply

So you would not consider Cuba, China, NK to be socialist? What are they then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Transitionary states developing their productive forces. Cuba might be close or was close, but they don’t have the technology or even the scale to develop them.

permalink
report
parent
reply

What are they transitioning to? In what way was Cuba close?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If it isn’t state ownership it’s private ownership.

permalink
report
reply

Do you want everything to be owned by the state?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Until it doesn’t have to be, yes. Only way to safeguard the revolution.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Why does state ownership safeguard the revolution? What would happen if the state is taken over by capitalist elements?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sounds like State Capitolism

permalink
report
reply

So is capitalism defined by something other than mere ownership? What could that something be?

permalink
report
parent
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 125

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments