Permanently Deleted

13 points

It sounds like boring jargon but a social problem can’t have technical solutions. We may trust a piece of software one day, but some day they may sell it or give it to feds or whatever, or it was compromised from the beginning like Tor. And then there’s always the problem of needing to enter the Matrix in order to pull people out of it.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

We aren’t asking for blind support for software but rather a commitment for transparent open source software that can’t just be given to the feds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I guess I was trying to say that I haven’t seen a way to guarantee such a thing, and that it would probably involve some IRL security/accountability measures with an organization

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

There’s no technical solution to social problems, but not all of the problems we need to solve are social problems. Technology can serve as a catalyst. Technology can serve as a force multiplier.

The AK-47 didn’t bring about communism, but it played an important role in the struggle.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Another thing that’s important to consider is that the primary task which Leftists of all tendencies face today is organizing the proletariat. There is no such thing as an app that will bring us Communism, but there is also no such thing as a modern organization without IT infrastructure.

A lot of small groups (and even some large ones) will outsource these responsibilities to Google, Facebook, Slack, etc. but this is a trade-off with many limitations and risks involved. If you’re running a campaign to guillotine Mark Zuckerburg, it is not going to survive very long on Facebook. If you draw the ire of the Feds, these platforms will happily comply with warrants and subpoenas without anybody in your organization being able to intervene or sound the alarm. They also have the power to cripple your organization simply by denying service.

On the other hand, you don’t want to give the first nerd who shows up to an organizer meeting the keys to the castle either. It has to be somebody who can absolutely be trusted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I try to use freeer software whenever I can but it also makes for pretty delicious looking honey pots

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It seems like we need a vanguard to push this forward :libre-vanguard:

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I actually tried joining chapo.chat on Matrix before but for some reason couldn’t so I’m gonna send you my username to invite me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
6 points

I sure am glad I did! Also crosspost it to c/technology cuz c/libre only has about 300 members.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Before you fight the man, teach me how to use nordvpn

permalink
report
reply
11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

You’re never going to have a socialist controlled alternative to social media or whatever. I do think in terms of actual organizing there needs to be investment in “socialist developed software” and hardware that is transparent and understood so eavesdropping private communication is harder for governments. You can never trust non-socialist developed software, just because it is dressed up in “privacy” and “internet freedom” language. That’s insanely difficult though considering commodity CPUs even have things like Intel Management Engine which is a black box with potential vulnerabilities and backdoors. But something practical could probably be developed for special use by organizers. Like a radio phone that has in-house hardware and an in-house operating system based on Linux or built from the ground up. Anything that receives constant patches and stuff like mainline Linux wouldn’t do in life-or-death type situation though, because it would take too long to review new patches.

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I was posting about this the other day. I was thinking about protest communication but I was thinking about the same kind of thing!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It would probably require winning over a bunch of people at universities and companies to help with their knowledge and access to stuff. But that kind of thing can’t be public 🤣.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

libre

!libre@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to libre

A comm dedicated to the fight for free software with an anti-capitalist perspective.

The struggle for libre computing cannot be disentangled from other forms of socialist reform. One must be willing to reject proprietary software as fiercely as they would reject capitalism. Luckily, we are not alone.

Resources

  1. Free Software, Free Society provides an excellent primer in the origins and theory around free software and the GNU Project, the pioneers of the Free Software Movement.
  2. Switch to GNU/Linux! If you’re still using Windows in $CURRENT_YEAR, flock to Linux Mint!; Apple Silicon users will want to check out Asahi Linux.

Rules

  1. Be on topic: Posts should be about free software and other hacktivst struggles. Topics about general tech news should be in the technology comm or programming comm. That doesn’t mean all posts have to be serious though, memes are welcome!
  2. Avoid using misleading terms/speading misinformation: Here’s a great article about what those words are. In short, try to avoid parroting common Techbro lingo and topics.
  3. Avoid being confrontational: People are in different stages of liberating their computing, focus on informing rather than accusing. Debatebro nonsense is not tolerated.
  4. All site-wide rules still apply

Artwork

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 672

    Posts

  • 2.6K

    Comments