Anonbal185
With Dutton in the opposition Albanese doesn’t even need to try. He can practically do whatever he wants and be re-elected next time.
Actually for me it’s quite good. Get like 1/3 back from dental. Then a bit back from gym fees. Optical is another one I use regularly and I get a massage a year. And most importantly ambulance cover just in case.
Granted one or two of them I would have skipped if I wasn’t paying private health (optical and massage).
At the higher salaries if people didn’t want to pay the Medicare surcharge and having to buy junk policies they can funnel their discretionary income into investments, the costs of the investments can be negatively geared so you can earn for example a million dollars and only pay 90000 taxable income worth of tax (an extreme example I know). ASX, property, into the business etc. where you reduce your taxable income in exchange for gaining (investable) assets.
I like NSW governments policy. Highrise depends on infrastructure and not how far it is from the CBD. But it is still not good enough.
We have 220m+ in Parramatta which is 20km from CBD and from what I understand the application for it to be higher was denied because it was too close to the airport.
Macquarie Park, Rhodes are new suburbs with 150m+ (definition for a skyscraper). Many others are getting 100m+, Olympic Park, Liverpool etc.
So it is quite spread out already. Even places very far away from Sydney like Penrith, Rouse Hill, Edmondson Park and Leppington will be zoned for high rise.
But we need to overhaul the zoning laws for the missing middle. In Sydney Bankstown to Marrickville and Revesby to Turella should all be up for 100m towers or maximum allowed due to proximity to airport.
It’s France they’re very xenophobic. Just look at how they treat the Corsicans, Brentons, Basques and Catalans.
Night and day to even a few hundred metres across the road in Spain or Andorra.
China is all aggressive because they know it’s now or never. Even before the bad news with their economy it was already a foregone conclusion beforehand.
Everyone knew their population would decline. Then their comparative advantage disappears. Their advantage is a shitload of people, even with a lower GDP per capita it’s still significant as it’s 4x the population as the next country (besides India, who are on an even lower GDP per capita right now)
Due to the sheer numbers they can use their internal market as political leverage. Disagree with them and no money for you.
There’s a few skirmishes but I think Putin has made Xi think twice. Although I do believe China can sustain quite a bit of losses if they do go to war before their advantage of many people disappears.
Firstly they have excess males so theoretically even if they lose excess soldiers it wouldn’t affect their birth rate as the issue is lack of women not men.
Might be a two eggs in one basket outlook for them, gain a bit of territory and rebalance their gender ratio.
We can only hope Putin’s war has made Xi think twice whilst we bide our time whilst their population decreases.
Encourage young footballers and ship them off early to Europe to play (preferably England so they’re guaranteed English language skills). But many go into international skills in non english speaking countries and you can’t tell the difference.
And then hope they play for Australia. There’s no way we’ll ever match them in investment so might as well leverage their resources to train our players.
Why would you even need a digital ID? My digital driver’s licence works great, accepted everywhere I go already and I’ve not carried a wallet for more than a year.
Transport card - digital Credit card - digital Loyalty cards - digital Drivers licence and all types of permits - digital Private health and Medicare - digital
Which place demands a physical copy of anything thesedays and moreover since it’s working fine why do we need another
I see this as a way for the government to earn a quick dollar and de facto get into the housing market.
When the owner buys back the share I doubt it will be calculated at the price the person bought it for. It would be at the market price at the time of the buyback.
I guess it works both ways too? I can see someone buying the minimum 2 percent and if they get something like opal or mascot towers when they sell at a loss the government is the one that loses out. So I can see it as a way to transfer the risk to the government and live in a place without having to pay rent.
In women’s rankings we actually do quite well, we’re 10th ahead of nations with a rich footballing culture such as Portugal, Italy, Belgium and Argentina. That’s why we’re talking about it. Our women can make the semi finals as we’ve shown here, our men have no chance.
Another thing is that this is the closest we’re getting to a world cup in Australia. That’s why the support is where it is now. Would the support be the same if it’s held in Europe or South America? I think half the people won’t wake up at whatever o’clock it is to watch the games.
Yes we have interest in football, after all it’s the most popular sport by far in the world. The Europeans and the South Americans can play well, so why can’t we? I think the answer is as simple as the tyranny of distance.
It’s way harder for players based here with family here to be able to go to a good academy because it’s half a world apart. The best coaches, the best facilities aren’t in Australia. We can’t get any of the European teams to come and play any consistent games here because it’s just too far besides the token pre season friendly if we’re lucky.
Yes a struggling league isn’t due to a lack of interest in football you’re right. There is interest. I would call it untapped potential. Yes it’s got the highest participation rate but somehow there’s a missing link to turn the participation rate to form a quality league (I wouldn’t say quality players because we do get them as I mentioned but they all just leave).
The A league has a player retention problem. And here’s the problem - two players get offers one from an A-league team and one from I would even say EFL championship team, where will the player go most of the time? It’s brain drain.
Like I said we need more than a world cup every 4 years, we need quality teams that people can go watch after work. That’s why the AFL and NRL is so popular. These players are around, the clubs are down the road. The stadium is down the road.
Back to the women’s football, only courtnee vine and clare hunt play in Australia. This is similar for mens. Otherwise we’ll have this conversation every 4 years where football falls off the radar for the general population.
