Avatar

FluffyPotato

FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
Joined
0 posts • 82 comments
Direct message

Like the closest thing to workers owning the means of production currently is coop businesses and Cuba is supporting that quite a bit but their economic model is state capitalist. Though yea, socialist orgs are definitely taking off, the local libertarian group here has never had this many members or this much success with organising.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Considering there arent any socialist countries today that would mean we are kinda boned.

permalink
report
reply

Wow, that is some bad title. I would say concerns are justified if Russia can just keep annexing chunks from other countries. It started with Georgia and Ukraine and we can see the same events happening in Moldova currently.

Also if Russia were to share a proper border with Poland then that’s pretty much guaranteed WW3, Poland hates Russia with a passion.

permalink
report
reply

If you don’t know how punctuations work just add em everywhere, some have to be correct then

permalink
report
reply

Dictatorship of the proletariat as Marx wrote has never been achieved and arguably(Depending on how naive you believe Lenin was) has never even been worked towards. MLs bastardization of that in the form of a vanguard party is just a different dictatorship of the bourgeoisie as it creates a ruling class.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes, the USSR annexing it’s neighbours and then exporting their resources and people was very much imperialism.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The workers party we are forming will be domocratic with no strongman.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It really depends on which bourgeois democracy. I may agree if compared to the US (I’m not too educated on the US so I could be wrong) but few others.

Though I fail to understand how that has anything to do with the topic of tankie having a consistent definition.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Do you believe capitalism is good because it helped some people? The whole point of socialism is to put the means of production into the hands of the workers and not a vanguard party. Yea, the USSR did quite a lot of imperialism which it used to reduce income inequality of the Russian people but it was never socialist.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You’re wrong, what Marx talked about was the whole class of workers being in power. Stalin perverted that idea to a vanguard party. Stalin’s system has always resulted in a ruling class composed of a class that was no longer the proletariat (if they even were to begin with). That system is not socialist, it is in fact no better than a capitalist system, as the hierarchies at work are equally unjust.

permalink
report
parent
reply