User's banner
Avatar

Anna ☭🏳️‍⚧️

Gopnik_Award@lemmygrad.ml
Joined
23 posts • 51 comments

she/her

Transfem Marxist-Leninist and Prolewiki Editor and Essayist.

All essays produced by me

Direct message

I like how you just pop up anywhere where it even shows or mention religion. Not even talking about religion directly, just showing some pictures is enough to make you wanna react.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The place where it apparently is in Liuzhou.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Guangxi is one of the Special Economic Zones administered by the PRC, so it is no surprise if the local government or the local people are liberals essentially.

permalink
report
parent
reply

God if there’s anything that goes more well together, it is that both Maoists and the Liberals both hate the DPRK.

How on earth is the DPRK a ‘semi-colony’? What the fuck even is a semi-colony? You’re either under imperialism (which the majority of the world is) or you’re imperialist. There’s little to no nations which are not imperialised. This can be applied to colonialism, as colonialism is a form of imperialism.

Secondly, the DPRK is the most isolationist out of the 5 socialist nations, even more so than Cuba. They do, however, primarily trade with China. Is China and the DPRK exchanging resources with each other an act of exploitation? Because it isn’t.

Also the DPRK is somehow fascist. Basically undermining fascism and what it truly means. I mean the Naxalites in India called Gandhi a fascist at one point, so I’m not surprised.

Juche is not a ‘useless’ philosophy. It’s a philosophy that applies well to the DPRK. We can discuss whether Juche is universal or not, but what matters is that the Juche ideology works well for the DPRK, and it is concrete towards the nation. There is no bourgeois class in the DPRK in the same manner that there is no bourgeois class in the USSR.

Also standing against ‘revisionism’. I agree. We must stand against Maoism, as it is inherently revisionist. Not against the so-called ‘revisionist’ nations like China or DPRK.

permalink
report
reply

The South China Sea is a complicated territory that cannot be answered through the use of sea territories only. Actually, in regards to the ‘imperialism’ of the South China Sea, China only has 8 installations within the South China Sea meanwhile the Philippines has 10. Vietnam has 25, Malaysia 7, and Taiwan has 2.

So your claim that China is actively imperialising the territory is false. If anything, Vietnam is the one that is actively doing it. But like I said, this question cannot be answered through territorial claims alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Laos really hasn’t put anything revolutionary regarding theory-wise, and combined with the fact that Laos never really was unique among its other nations (China with Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, DPRK with Juche), it just kind of fell into obscurity for the most part.

Nonetheless, it would be ideal to study this as long as we got theory for it. Unfortunately, the theory is sparse or hard to find, meaning that we don’t really have a solid basis.

permalink
report
reply

Ancaps are worse than ancoms, but that doesn’t make ancoms right in any significant sense.

permalink
report
reply

Engineer Gaming

permalink
report
parent
reply