![Avatar](/_next/image?url=%2Flemmy-icon-96x96.webp&w=3840&q=75)
GrafZahl [he/him]
Redistribute acoording to needs. Allow fredom of association. Assign a state-mandated friend to every child.
Marx’s dong so big it’s weighing the picture down. Hawt.
IDK I’ll leave it to ChatGPT to find an answer :blob-no-thoughts:
Years of telling me to touch grass now you want me to kill Grass :meow-tableflip:
Don’t have a guide, but last time I played there were some starter “buildings” you can place instant and for free. One of them should be a construction office. But there’s also free logistics, some storages, and gas station. Connect them with dirt road, buy vehicles. That should be everything you need to start building. If map is empty you have to get workers from customs too.
Oh yeah, well what If I replaced / with : and changed the order of operations to create confusion and clickbait
The points you mention as possible responses are correct of course. But I feel it would make me sound like I’m trying to avoid answering an actual question. Assuming the argument was chiefly a moral one, the question could be, “are indigenous hunting practices morally wrong?”. How would you answer this, without deflecting?
I don’t necessarily see how it would hurt my position to say that killing animals is wrong, no matter who does it. If the pro-murder side accuses me of being a colonialist/settler whatever, it’s easy to point out, that colonialist interference to stop indigenous hunting practices by force is also morally wrong, and the two positions are not mutually exclusive. As of yet, no vegan militia has encircled a native village anywhere in the world.
I can’t speak much about US politics, but if we move to an argument about policy, I could simply agree that lobbying efforts should be focused on the curtailing or abolishment of commercial murder.
Just living that lower upper middle class life
My favorite part was when he said ‘its shazzin time’