data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8d18/c8d18173f5884ac2d77f5f879c151c0da5530560" alt="Avatar"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4c9d/a4c9db6983a6f4bd9bb714c0af75865cb73edfce" alt="Avatar"
Kissaki
In 2021, YouTube announced that it had invested “hundreds of millions of dollars” to create content management tools, of which Content ID quickly emerged as the platform’s go-to solution to detect and remove copyrighted materials.
Content ID was introduced in 2021? Only 3 years ago? I thought it was significantly older.
Dunno if they meant something different or typoed the year.
Dunno about Germany. It had a big move to the right. The second strongest party is now right, passing two other traditional established parties.
There are website services where you both stay online and transfer directly.
There could be direct peer to peer transfer tools that are more robust.
If you want to go through a file transfer/hoster
- no limit https://gofile.io/
- 300 GB limit https://1fichier.com/
There’s some more, those are the top two in my bookmarks.
You’d do good of encrypting/7z-passwording if you don’t want others to see the content, just to make sure not to have to trust the hoster.
I cannot subscribe
details needed
It may just be coincidental. Chasing hosters and legal battles takes time.
Random instances can group, that’s soll random.
The executable being packed in an executable format means it has to be decompressed on each launch. If it doesn’t it means it’s not saving any space anyway.
I don’t know what packing you’re looking for, but Windows applications are typically installed with installers. An executable compressed executable goes against this; unless you want to pack installers.
Traditional file compression works well enough. People know to launch an msi or exe or read a README. Introducing non-standard tools is not necessarily a good idea, and certainly is not intuitive to users not already familiar with it.