Life2Space
Entrepreneurship is good, though. Innovation is necessary to make progress in advancing society, especially now that the US and its’ satellites are preventing the export of high-value technological products to the country.
As for the crime, well, that’s what happens when you live in the cradle of neoliberal rot and decay. The laws are no good if the ones writing and enforcing them are rats and maggots.
Is Russia Fascist?
No.
American media is disgustingly decadent; always publicly discussing about genitalia, sex, drugs and other yuck without a hint of shame.
You and I both know that is never going to happen.
This is a paraphrase of a comment that I posted on Reddit some time ago:
China certainly exports ideology. For example, the notion of “mutually beneficial win-win cooperation” as opposed to the “zero-sum game”. These types of ideals serve as the foundation for China-Global South (South-South) cooperation to industrialize and modernize former colonized and developing nations rather than simply exist as raw material exporters. This way, they can finally pry the grasp of the imperial core on their holdings and become an independent, sovereign power. You could consider that exporting “revolution” or “socialism”.
Realistically? Nothing.
Furthermore to be Socialist would be to aid comrades internationally, yet China not only has not promised to ever do this (nor is this something Communist would ever dare hide from the Global masses), but they’ve actually done the opposite on multiple occasions."
But China does aid “comrades” by working with any country, regardless of the complaints of the imperial core, and promoting mutually beneficial, win-win cooperation and pro-Global South industrialization and modernization. Just recently, China pledged to help defend Venezuela’s national sovereignty and economic transition into an industrial economy rather than simply existing as a raw material exporter. China’s foreign policy in the past has not always been great, but that does not mean that we should let the mistakes overshadow the accomplishments. That would just be historical nihilism. The commenter’s idea of internationalism seems to be incessantly lending arms and money into so-called Maoist armies, but this is not China’s approach to diplomacy—China is not the USSR and shouldn’t strive to be!
I’m not even going to bother with the rest of this childish take—nothing but rhetoric and overzealous dogmatism over material reality.