“Now let’s say, for the sake of argument, that when I was a young boy, hypothetically speaking, my father took me into the city to see a marching band…”

“In an amendment to the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill”. So basically shoving in some bare minimum anti racism legislation that they probably won’t enforce, as a way to get people to support a bill which also effectively criminalises any meaningful protest. That’s a yikes.

Yeah there was a historical reason. The same reason as now. Capitalism is shit.

Are they trying to invent new racism just to prove that ‘gammon’ is racist???

“Spanish and Italian explorers were here first”??? Aren’t they forgetting another group of people???

It really fucking sucks that, amongst all this incredibly important dialogue about making women safe, there are always TERFs trying to blame trans women for the actions of cis men.

Maybe literacy is always the first priority of communist revolutions because it’s so important?? How can you industrialise properly if your population is illiterate? How can you hold meaningful elections if large portions of the population are illiterate?

There’s a joke that in some of Labour’s heartland areas you could stick a red rosette on a donkey and it would win. Looking at Sir Keith, we may as well have, it would have done a better job as leader.

Keir Starmer. Because of course when the country most needed a strong socialist opposition, the Labour Party is lead by this absolute wetwipe, a flag shagging automaton. He’s already blindly supported the Tories’ failed covid policy, abstained on torture, voted for the Brexit he spent years saying was bad for the country and replaced any real helpful policies with vague nationalist rhetoric. So of course he’s trying to brown nose big business too.

Ikr. She’s off on one again, talking about trans people being ‘obsessed’, seemingly not seeing the irony.

https://mobile.twitter.com/salltweets/status/1357796079505264640