Saizaku
Hi, could you perhaps elaborate a bit on the racist history of the bell curve? I’m well aware of the racist history of IQ, but I don’t even have an inkling of what that’s referring to in the context of the bell curve. It’s just the graph of a normal distribution, is this referring to some weird application of it to some racist shit?
PS: I know you’ve attached a video with info on it and me asking might be kinda dumb. However, I saw it’s 2+hrs and I don’t have the time to watch it right now but I’m still interested.
Not riverboat businesses, rather we have plenty of restaurants and clubs on rafts on the Danube river in belgrade.
But that’s the least of our worries rn, we had elections last week and the current president and government organized massive theft of the elections. There have been massive protests for a week since. They drove people from Bosnia to vote in our elections, hell the Bosnian minister of security voted in the Belgrade mayoral elections and proudly posted about it on twitter. Apparently he’s a resdient of Belgrade lol. Last night they sent a thousand cops at us to beat us up and break up the protest. Today student orgs are blocking infrastructure in Belgrade, and from 6pm we’re going to the parliament building again to block it off.
Our president claimed that there were barely a thousand people gathered when he spoke through state media:
For the uninitiated our current president is Aleksandar Vucic, also known as Milosevic’s minister of propaganda.
Oh I always take any reporting on China by western media with a grain of salt (the amount varying by the outlet in question). I haven’t quite made up my mind on Uighur thing as I haven’t had the time to properly research it myself (a lot of irl stuff going on) but I’m approaching the topic with scepticism.
I mainly linked the article for the interview and it’s description of the state of things for the lgbtq+ community in China which seems to be pretty similar to what an onilne friend from China described. Althoguh the language used around the topic and some of the conclusions (interpretations) in the article are pretty weird.
In retrospect I probably should’ve put a disclaimer that I don’t endorse the entirety of the article.
Highly recommend reading the actual article from which I assume the previous commenter got fear info from: https://www.hackingbutlegal.com/p/naomi-wu-and-the-silence-that-speaks-volumes?
The article contains an interview with Naomi aswell.
Also as a slight correction the third strike could lead to years in prison according to the article, not a single year.
The word has effectively lost all meaning starting with neolib youtubers posing as leftists ( think Vaush etc). I’m an anarchist and got called a tankie for debunking propaganda against 20th century socialist projects. I have my critiques of the communist projects and leaders of the 20th century but apparently if I don’t buy CIA propaganda that makes me a tankie.
Exactly this, you need to ground this type of argument in material analysis. Getting into a moral grandstanding contest with libs is an extremely pointless waste of time. Noone likes civilian (debatable how innocent you can claim israeli citizens are when they are actively participating in settler colonialism) casualties, what’s the cause? How do you stop it? By dissolving the illegal state of Israel.
It’s disappointing but necessarily surprising tbh. China has been doing state capitalism for a while now.
As for your question these statistics aren’t necessarily contradictory to the idea of extreme poverty being reduced/eradicated. As this is basically a measure of wealth inequality, and while it might be worse than pre revolution, the standard of life is undoubtedly much higher. This is a result of China’s explosive economic growth, there is simply way more wealth in China than ever before. So a higher wealth inequality isn’t necessarily a good indicator of poverty. It is however an apt representation of the CCP’s economic policies over the past two decades and is a good indicator that poverty will rise once China’s growth slows down if wealth inequality isn’t addresed.
Idk why you would ever allow r/196 to move to your instance. I had to unsub from that place like a year before I even moved to Lemmy. I’m not trans so maybe my perspective is a bit skewed but that place always seemed to fetishize trans people so much, especially mtf. Also the users there seemed very keen on pushing one specific way to be trans as valid. When anyone in the comments would complain about any of this they would be downvoted to hell. I’m of the mind that even if you don’t think you’re doing anything objectively wrong if people complain that it’s hurtful you should try to be accommodating, especially in a trans place/community. I genuinely don’t understand why you would allow that kind of community to migrate to your instance if you have a goal of building a safe space for queer people.
On a different note I specifically avoided blahaj when trying to find an instance to settle on cause I saw 196 was there, so I guess I dodged a bullet.