crushendo [he/him]
theyre going to decide that they have to get even more conservative. will nominate the corpse of John McCain as the next speaker
hey this is a great list of cool sites and orgs to check out. thanks feds
use your position and pay to help others. marx needed engles to write capital, be somebody’s engles
Woodrow Wilson because he was racist in every form
joe just wants to hang out with his old buds again. he’s turning the white house into a retirement home for his friends
M̷̢̺̖̜̯͖̪̍͂̊̄̍̾̊͌̀͑̄́̓͒̅̌̈́̿͐͘̚̕͝͝͝͠͝O̴̡̧̡̩̟̤̙͎͉̤̼̜̝̯̞͙̟͓͔̤̪̝̭̳̹͓͓̳͒͂̃̎́̊̔̂̂̈́͛̊̋̾̃̀̀̊̐̇̾̉̔̈́̆̾̂̿͘͘͜ͅR̶̢̧̡̧̛͔̦̮̗̺̪̫̘̲̙͔̹̙̖̝̹̼̖̺͆̌̾̒̈̈́̀͒̓̇̏͌̌̅̿͗̾̔̓̉̔̀̂̌̔̈͘͘͜͜͜͠͠Ȩ̸̻̠̘͕͇̭̩̱͙̭͒̓͆̔͑̑͒̾̈́̑̓́͗̏̿̾̀̑͐̅̃͛̓͐̊́͝ͅͅ
Hey I’m an agricultural engineer who has worked with GMOs before and currently researches ag + climate stuff. GMOs are fine, they’ve done some good and might be able to do a lot more. The problem is though that GMO advocates tend to fall into techno-optimist cliches where they say CRISPR and advanced multi trait GMOS are going to save the world, when they very clearly arent. From a climate perspective, GMOs are next to useless due to the ~13 year development cycle they have, meaning they cannot act nearly fast enough to avert the coming crisis. GMOs and other technical solutions are often propped up by people who dont want to do any of the work that will actually be required to stave off climate change, like massivly overhauling the global economy and clamping down western consumption. They can be useful at some things and we shouldnt throw them aside, but its also not really worth spending a ton of time defending them, and the people who do are usually bad actors.
uhh, is your boyfriend single?
yo but fr sounds like an amazing relationship and the kind of guy I’m trying to be
if we can learn anything from japan, the answer is absolutely not